So what conditions need to be met before this can be considered a success?
Exactly, it seems to be there ploy to disagree with the Conservatives on every contentious issue.
the government are too busy spunking a load over spanking money on bombs to care about an end game, just like most of ocuk retarded daily mail readers
Britain will be safer and I read the Sun
Oh well, let's bomb the crap out of a country in the middle east, kill some innocent civilians and then try to extract ourselves from the mess we've added to.
What could go wrong?
Reading the sun equals low IQ
That's no way to talk about Corbyn and the hipsters who voted for him!Right now the little bearded fascists are scurrying around...
Quite, it's like they're playing at being MPs.Off topic, but I feel the SNP, since the general election, have shown themselves to be worthless and the least credibly of the regional parties in parliament.
Bombing an ideology is not going to stop an ideology. An ideology does not need land to succeed. This will only increase the likelihood of domestic threats occurring.
During a 10-hour debate, David Cameron argued that action against the "medieval monsters" of IS was legal and would "keep our country safe".
Astonishing turn around from the Government: two years ago they wanted us to fight Assad, now we're sending our bombers out to defeat his greatest foe. Make no mistake, we are now allies of a regime that dropped chemical weapons on its own people.
its ok the MPs on the boards of arms companies just made a few £££ what's the harm in blowing up some Syrian kids for increased share prices
Send mrMoonX for face to face talks with ISIS.
Why are people so bothered (apparently) by potential Syrian civilian deaths but not Iraqi?
Why are people so bothered (apparently) by potential Syrian civilian deaths but not Iraqi?