Jeffrey Epstein

Epstein interacted with anyone prominent, that was his job, and yes that includes Elon. The goal of the article is to plant the idea that he might have visited the island, even though he didn't, because if he had, the flight logs would have been disclosed. It's to create uncertainty about whether he actually went there; typical fake news rag behaviour
 
Last edited:
Does beg the question of why he didn't though, I guess it could just be disinterest but he's hardly a cautious or shy person going by his altogether awkward attempts to schmooze his wealthy peers. If he knew better than to bother with Epstein then it's surely based off of at least some level of evidence that it was a bad idea, presumably rumours which makes anyone who did orbit the man very much without any excuse.
 
Em3bbs said:
Elon even said in the past he had been invited there but turned it down. It's not even news. But I guess a good headline for gullible people.
Click to expand...

Exactly and of course it gets shared around like that without context.

StriderX said:
Does beg the question of why he didn't though, I guess it could just be disinterest but he's hardly a cautious or shy person going by his altogether awkward attempts to schmooze his wealthy peers. If he knew better than to bother with Epstein then it's surely based off of at least some level of evidence that it was a bad idea, presumably rumours which makes anyone who did orbit the man very much without any excuse.
Click to expand...


Quite plausibly he knew the guy was sleazy, whether he or others knew just how sleazy is another matter. I do find it hard to believe the circle of friends around Epstein didn't at least know or realise that he was at least a prolific user of prostitutes even if they didn't necessarily know about any of the underage/sex trafficking aspect.

Which as you indicate, does leave open questions about the judgement/morals of some of those who chose to associate with him regardless.
 
VincentHanna said:
Yes I did read the article

I didn't say they were paedophiles.

Apologies for posting Epstein news in the Epstein thread :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
You're either gullible, didn't read the article, or you knew what you were doing. You posted you were amazed that nobody posted something which was a clear BBC attempt at implicating Musk was far move involved with Epstein than he was. The article confirmed what Musk had already told us ages ago, why were you so 'amazed'? The BBC knew exactly what they were doing.

Funnily enough mrk posted the same article in a WhatsApp group I'm in with him, and he never reads past a headline.
 
Last edited:
dirty-old-man-you-dirty-old-man.gif
 
Not like it matters at all to a good portion of the American people.
It amazes me that he even won the vote.....TWICE (or three times depending who you ask). Doesn't speak well to the general intelligence of the voters as a whole.
If the files are eventually released, it would be labelled as fake.
Even if a video game out of him grabbing someone they'd spin it, fake news, AI etc
 
Last edited:
Well as these are just the estate emails.. Trump may be pushed to quit by republicans trading his quiet exit for blocking the release of the Epstein files that safeguards donors etc.
 
Last edited:


Emails show:

Democrats deceitfully redacted Viriginia's name, knowing full well she has already testified that Trump didn't do anything inappropriate

Emails show Michael Wolff advising Epstein on blackmail strategies against Trump

Trump confronted Ghislaine to halt Epstein-related activities at Mar-a-Lago, banning Epstein after learning of his behavior.

+ Democrats unanimously blocked a Republican motion for full Epstein files release today.
 
Last edited:
trumps been exonerated by VG and ghislaine(in hr 5* prison) -and he just spent hours chewing the cud with younger VG , but had no inkling of what was going on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom