I'm looking forward to this, but probably end up watching it on BD as i've not got much chance to make it to the cinema at the moment.
Not really, films are digitally delivered to the cinemas now, instead of reels, so they can and do, sometimes edit until the very last minute.
in some cases after delivery, I seem to remember a few years back they delivered an update a few days after a film had been showing.
Also IIRC the way they deliver them digitally should make it relatively easy to change the credits or add something at the start or end.
It's sad to to hear the news, as I have enjoyed everything I saw him do, and given his relatively small number of major roles he did really well in them.
Personally I agree with
@Smeghead. 3hrs is too long for most features, let alone an action romp. If it's all action, it could be exhausting. If it has more drama and story sections, people will complain.
I always keep an open mind, and will for this too. But it does concern me slightly.
I think it depends on the film.
I've seen films that have barely been 70 minutes long and it's felt like they went on for hours, on the other hand I've watched some that were 3+ hours long and I was surprised when I realised they were near the end.
It all depends on the story and pacing, there is no reason an "action romp" can't work at this sort of run time.
My only major complaint with long run times is that no film seems to be made with an intermission now, a lot of the old long runners had a specific point where they could stop for 15 minutes to allow you to pop to the loo, or restock on snacks, or simply get up and give your bum and legs a chance to recover from the invariably uncomfortable seating.