Just put my name down for one of these:-

Morba said:
it just looks better the more i look at it. how much are they looking to market t in the US (not that i can afford it!)

A while back, the figure being bandied about was between $30k and $35k. That then rose to $50k given the limited numbers that the car is being built in initially. Current plan I believe is to have one model (the SRT-8) available on the first run, then for the next model year they'll start adding to the range.

$50k is still pretty damn good for the kind of car you're getting IMO. Nearest competitor in the Ford camp is probably the GT500 'stang (Saleens don't count as they are modified :)) which is a similar price but has a tiny little 5.4l motor compared with the 6.1 HEMI of the Challenger.
 
Gibbo said:
122x6056.jpg
.
holds no appeal for me whatsoever i'm afraid.
i like the Mustang for what it is, but the Challenger above does nothing for me.
 
AcidHell2 said:
I love the rear end, Think it would look much better in black, maybe even plum crazy purple. Hope they do a hideaway headlight option, as it really does look cool on american muscle cars.

Was just about to post the exact opposite, the front isnt bad, the rear is vile. Wouldnt be on my list, but if it floats your boat :)
 
JRS said:
A while back, the figure being bandied about was between $30k and $35k. That then rose to $50k given the limited numbers that the car is being built in initially. Current plan I believe is to have one model (the SRT-8) available on the first run, then for the next model year they'll start adding to the range.

$50k is still pretty damn good for the kind of car you're getting IMO. Nearest competitor in the Ford camp is probably the GT500 'stang (Saleens don't count as they are modified :)) which is a similar price but has a tiny little 5.4l motor compared with the 6.1 HEMI of the Challenger.

jesus!
given the current exchange rate, that is an absolutely bonkers price!
not quite as dear as i thought it would be (even after the price rise).
 
122x6056.jpg


All that picture needs is a group of concerned people to keep it wet with sea water, keep the blowhole free of debris and wait for the high tide and a harness.

I love American muscle, but that (to me) is a hideous, bloated reincarnation of a classic with a swage line that is frankly disturbing.

And yes, before you start...pot, kettle etc.


The_Dark_Side said:
holds no appeal for me whatsoever i'm afraid.
i like the Mustang for what it is, but the Challenger above does nothing for me.
 
The_Dark_Side said:
holds no appeal for me whatsoever i'm afraid.
i like the Mustang for what it is, but the Challenger above does nothing for me.

I'd like to echo these sentiments. Just doesn't look right.
 
gord said:
You could well possibly be in for the Gibbo'lecture: American Cars Do Go Round Corners.


Hi there

How can I lecture on a car there is very little known about. Rumour is it may weigh 1800kg and so indeed might be scary round corners, just have to wait and see I guess.
 
I'll part ex my Corsa Comfort 1.2 for your Saleen when the Dodge comes in? It's got like 90bhp or something. It's pretty nasty.
 
gord said:
You could well possibly be in for the Gibbo'lecture: American Cars Do Go Round Corners.


they do

but only once you've splashed the cash bringing the suspension into the 20th century.

the Mustang GT as standard, is hopless. The Saleen as standard, is better, but still not up there with european cars. Gibbo's saleen has basically all of saleens optional handling kit (in effect, i believe some bits were sourced from other makers etc.. but the same things) fitted, thus meaning it does go round corners.
 
MrLOL said:
they do

but only once you've splashed the cash bringing the suspension into the 20th century.

the Mustang GT as standard, is hopless. The Saleen as standard, is better, but still not up there with european cars. Gibbo's saleen has basically all of saleens optional handling kit (in effect, i believe some bits were sourced from other makers etc.. but the same things) fitted, thus meaning it does go round corners.


Hi there

Sorry can't agree wih that. Mustang GT will corner just as good as any other saloon car (normal Euro Saloon cars, not M5's, S4's etc). All it suffers from is been under damped and a bit too much body roll but it still grips well and has very predictable handling.

Roush and Saleen cars in completely standard trim without spending extra money on them are very good. They fix the under damping with new shocks/springs and help elimate body roll with front and rear anti-roll bars. The Saleen and Roush are right up there with European cars, all certainly the European cars I've driven anyway, M3's, M5's, Civics, Mini, Focus ST, Focus RS, Supra to name but a few. Cars that do handle better and corner faster than a standard Roush/Saleen would be vehicles such as Elise, S2000, Boxster, 911, F360, F430, M3 CSL etc.

I just took mine further not because the car was not good enough but because I have issues and can't resist pulling a car apart especially when its possible to improve it further even if I don't ever take advantage of those improvements. Still I have noticed the improvements on the road, difference is the Mustang was intended by Ford to be a basic platform but one that was very easy to improve upon and for very little money. Saleen and Roush do what 90% of customers would be happy with and enough to equal other grand tourers and sport cars from European and Japanese rivals. That 10% who want better can do so very easily from the wealth of parts available and how easy the Mustang is to work on.

With a 911 or BMW M3 the platform has been designed to be just about the best it can offer, yes it can still be improved upon but fact is out of the box a 911 or BMW M3 is one corner carving beast, but they are 3x the price of a Mustang GT. Roush/Saleen bring their cars upto or indeed very close to that of BMW M3's and other similar specced European/Japanese cars.

All I can say is its hard to explain, best way is for someone to spend time in cars such as Mustang GT, Roush, Saleen, M3, RS4 etc. and then decide because in general most owners of Mustangs have had fast high performance European cars previously and find the handling absolutely fine. :) Wheras people such as yourself have never driven a Mustang GT before let alone spent several hours in one and even more so one with the basic suspension tweaks that dramatically improve these cars. :)
 
MrLOL said:
they do

but only once you've splashed the cash bringing the suspension into the 20th century.

I'll take it that you meant 21st century :)

Aaaaaanyway, let us take a closer look at the LC platform which the car will be built on.

The front suspension is a control arm design from Merc that was further developed by Chrysler. The rear end is a fully independent 5 link setup, also originally developed by Merc and further improved by Chrysler.

Yeah, sounds really pre-historic that. But hey, why let facts get in the way? ;)

t's going to be a bit more nose-heavy than Gibbo's Mustang (not quite as bad as the GT500, but noticeable over the GT/Saleen/Roush 'stangs) and a good bit heavier overall, which is why it's getting more power as standard. Rated for 425hp, with the tuning potential to take it up past 800 without sacrificing much in the way of reliability. Favourite of the current modding ideas IMO would be going to The Hemi Shop and getting the parts to take the engine up to 426 cubes. Ported heads, high comp pistons and other assrted goodies should see the happy side oo 600 horsepower with no loss in driveability.
 
Back
Top Bottom