Kate Middleton topless..

Wow - A few pictures of a naked female human, and you can hardly tell that it is her (it could be stunt doubles for all I would know) I understand that the royal family are, right now, and have been for a while, trying to improve their public image especially the heirs and potential heir to the throne. Having said that, we are all just human, we all have natural urges for intimacy with a partner or maybe to flirt with girls at a party (all recent royal pics) I don't see why anyone gives a flying. Okay they are in a position of extreme privilege but they are still just human - likely to have intimate relationships and flirt to get there..... why the fuss? Are we, the public, so transfixed on how 'the other half live' we need to see these pics??? Does the other half have a different method of copping off? Does Harry pounce in his prey injecting them with a paralyzing chemical from his freaky 2nd penis, only to then use some type of secretion fluid from his 2nd anus to wrap them up ready for when he decides to devour them in some strange ritual headed by HRH Lolth....

Now if that were the case I WOULD subscribe to that immediately.. but as we live in the real world I prefer my privacy while I flirt and bed my conquests....

3bd6540e.jpg
 
Last edited:
desires said:
I don't get the pippa arse hype. From far away behind it looks like she has the perfect waist to hips shape but side on it's pretty flat.
Click to expand...

Indeed.
I've seen more voluptuous bottoms on men. Pippa's backside is nothing special.
I much prefer Carol Vorderman's.
 
fish99 said:
I'll never understand people idolizing the royal family, they're not even our royal family, they're Germans - the Saxe-Coburg-Gothas. Windsor is just a name they made up essentially for PR reasons during the war.
Click to expand...

I thought they were lizards from another dimension? :D
 
If this Daily Mail article is correct then I'm not sure that anyone would have been able to see that photographer with the naked eye. The photos are really poor quality, you could tell they were from a seriously long way away. I think that if this is the nearest road to the chateau then I wouldn't have any qualms about sunbathing topless either (if I wanted to!)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...eoId=&hasBCVideo=true&BCVideoID=1839821038001

I like the French editor's attempts to justify herself by saying things like, "the pictures are nothing that you wouldn't see on a beach" and, "it's just a completely normal sight to see when someone is on holiday with their husband" - so why print them on the front page of a magazine with the title "Oh My God!"?
 
Last edited:
Distance is ridiculous if that is true...

Apparently Chi (Italian), (the paper that printed the pictures of Diana after the crash on the floor in 06 - or something) will be running a 26 page special edition of this. They say they have 200 photos. Presumably though the 'best' images were published by closer already...

kd
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom