** Kingdom Come : Deliverance 2 **

Have the rules of engagement been set for which reviews we take notice of or not depending on what they did for games where we wanted them to review badly but they didn't, and thus deemed not credible.
 
Last edited:
melmac said:
I loved the combat. It's supposed to be hard, that's in keeping with the rest of the game.

That said, it's going to be interesting to see how they balance the combat in the second game. I mean during the first game, as part of the story, you are trained in hunting, fighting etc.
Click to expand...
All I hope is they improve bow-play. As it stands, I cannot for the life of me hit a person with an arrow… let alone a hare.
 
Noxia said:
Have the rules of engagement been set for which reviews we take notice of or not depending on what they did for games where we wanted them to review badly but they didn't, and thus deemed not credible.
Click to expand...
Ignore ign or anyone who was paid to shill for veilgaurd I guess.
 
Last edited:
Noxia said:
Have the rules of engagement been set for which reviews we take notice of or not depending on what they did for games where we wanted them to review badly but they didn't, and thus deemed not credible.
Click to expand...
I get that you are being facetious but I personally will not put much stock in what Eurogamer and RPS have to say, considering their past write-ups on many games incl. KCD1 or even Mafia 1. If their reviews are devoid of complaining about some leftist nonsense, I will be pleasantly surprised.
Mobius 1 said:
Ignore ign or anyone who was paid to shill for veilgaurd I guess.
Click to expand...

Funnily enough the reviewer of Veilguard also reviewed KCD1 back in the day (and liked it, and the review was fair and devoid of modern politics). I think the same person will be reviewing KCD2.
 
As with all these things, I find the best approach (when you are on the fence for example) Is to check a wide number of sources including ones you are not particularly fond of, just to see if there are recurring themes or opinions between them.
I think this game will review very well. The only points I can imagine may come up is performance potentially, and that is purely because it's rare that a pc game is launched these days without some performance issue.
 
Last edited:
Noxia said:
Have the rules of engagement been set for which reviews we take notice of or not depending on what they did for games where we wanted them to review badly but they didn't, and thus deemed not credible.
Click to expand...
I think the general rule of thumb is ignore 7gn who give everything a 7, take PCgamer with a hefty pinch of salt and ignore the worthabuy fella who hates any major title or any game that didnt give him a free key
 
I would always try to read reviews from a bunch of places, you can think somewhere is particularly biased for or against your point of view so ignoring a select few doesn't really make sense.
 
Tombstone said:
I think the general rule of thumb is ignore 7gn who give everything a 7, take PCgamer with a hefty pinch of salt and ignore the worthabuy fella who hates any major title or any game that didnt give him a free key
Click to expand...

Did that worthabuy fella get a free key for this? Im guessing he did.
I have seen a comment from him that he thinks the game is great and best RPG he has ever played, and goty without doubt :D , he normally rubbishes a lot of games.
 
Last edited:
To be honest I generally just watch reviews for the latest footage, unless of cause it's the worst game ever :cry:

Steam reviews and OCUK thread reviews tend to be more honest and less, IGN here's some cash
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom