I wish they'd offer laser eye surgery on the NHS, rather than class it as a "cosmetic proceedure." It makes me wonder how people get boob jobs done, but something as important as eye sight isn't covered.
Interesting point actually.
Of course, in the past, Glasses/contact lenses were the only option for people with poor eyesight.
But now other treatment options are available. Should poor eyesight continue to be considered simply a cosmetic matter, or should it be regarded as a treatable disability?
Obviously, there are degrees of poor eyesight ranging from only being mildly inconvenienced to being essentially blind without correction.
I think if ones eyesight is so poor that you cannot effectively function without correction (IE Cant Drive, Cant read, Cant watch TV and, in particular, cant find your glasses if you have dropped them) then if it is treatable, then treatment on the NHS would be justified.
On the other hand, if all you have is (say) a little bit of astigmatism which doesn't prevent you from doing any of these things but just leaves your vision a little bit blurry but otherwise OK, then perhaps not.
(EG I had cataract surgery a couple of years ago. My distance vision is spot on but there is still some astigmatism which means that I am happier wearing glasses for night- driving/going to the cinema. I can do both perfectly well without glasses, but the experience is better with them under low light level conditions. )
But where do you draw the line between?
I would suggest the sight requirement for driving should be the break point.
What say others?