Legal query

[itchy]

You can hack or obtain any ones email account details. He just been fishing and knowing her original has made it more easy for him.

He would know her mobile number, so location and login details would be in the wild.
Hexadecimal System can crack most things on computers also binary base 10, which is the best but is hard as hell to do. Not that he is that clever mind you.

Tip if you go into windows calculator and select view, you can select programmers calculator.

Down the rabbit hole you go.

 

[McMav]

Husband is probably a control freak that insisted on it for the reasons demonstrated in this thread.

Bingo we have a winner

 

[McMav]

Well do make sure she gets herself a gmail account and activates 2 step verification.

Done that a while back when

 

[Hades]

It sounds to me like he was the primary account holder and was therefore authorised to take the actions he did.

 

[McMav]

It sounds to me like he was the primary account holder and was therefore authorised to take the actions he did.

Already said he was primary account holder. What I'm saying does it give him the right to read personal information/email on an email address that was setup for his wife? If they all used the same password then I'd say yes no problems with that. However they didnt and he has reset the password on that one account to gain access to read personal emails and details. To me that is an invasion of privacy at minimum. More so as private messages from lawyers have possibley been read and compromised regarding the divorce. Sis has contacted her lawyer regarding this so will see whats happened. Audit trails at BT can be requsted to prove who has changed passwords and when and where that email account has been accessed from. We have the dates and times when access was lost.

 

[ubersonic]

No he did not if he had it he wouldn't have needed to change it.

Then that bumps it from a section one CMA violation to section two (increases max sentence from six months to five years).

To illustrate my point in the case of BT. The account holder is responsible for the use of others.....

That means that you are the one responsible for ensuring your kid doesn't use his BT account to mailbomb NASA or something. It doesn't give you the right to hack into your wife's email account and read her private emails (and even if it said you could a BT TOS wouldn't overrule UK law anyway).

 

[antijoke]

I am disappointed in GD, before we can offer any further assistance can you please post pictures of said Sister.

 

[glenimp617]

I am disappointed in GD, before we can offer any further assistance can you please post pictures of said Sister.

only ONE person has ever done this and the mods quickly deleted the post and closed the thread.

 

[Hades]

Already said he was primary account holder. What I'm saying does it give him the right to read personal information/email on an email address that was setup for his wife? If they all used the same password then I'd say yes no problems with that. However they didnt and he has reset the password on that one account to gain access to read personal emails and details. To me that is an invasion of privacy at minimum. More so as private messages from lawyers have possibley been read and compromised regarding the divorce. Sis has contacted her lawyer regarding this so will see whats happened. Audit trails at BT can be requsted to prove who has changed passwords and when and where that email account has been accessed from. We have the dates and times when access was lost.

It entirely depends on the contract agreed to between the primary account owner and the service provider. What do the terms state? Without seeing them we can only guess what permission the primary account owner has. But the term 'primary' leads me to believe they are the actual account owner and accessing the sub accounts is not a misuse.