Let us MSPaint each others sigs

Status
Not open for further replies.
iCraig said:
I don't understand the point in lying, you used a filter.. big deal.

Before you argue that you've haven't and you've just used colour sampling etc etc etc, line up your original and "paint" version together. They allign perfectly. :rolleyes:

allignedql2.gif


Top layer is the painted version at 50% opacity. No blurring, just lines up perfectly. ;)
Click to expand...
yes they line up, as i said... i used fireworks... which has layers ;)

wtf is the deal with all the skepticsim on here...
do you want the PNG file hosted so you can check it yourself?
 
Christ, what is it you don't get?

Here's a close up of your sig:

aa.jpg


See all those pixels that are almost the same colour but gently fade from the face to the background, that happens when you use a soft brush, which is impossible in mspaint. I have not done the same thing, all my sigs could have been made in paint, it would just take longer.
 
Tru said:
Christ, what is it you don't get?

Here's a close up of your sig:

aa.jpg


See all those pixels that are almost the same colour but gently fade from the face to the background, that happens when you use a soft brush, which is impossible in mspaint. I have not done the same thing, all my sigs could have been made in paint, it would just take longer.
Click to expand...
it's two layers,
original layer with parts coloured in, and then a second layer where which is just bits coloured in...
if i've missed anything out on either two layers then yes you get those pixels which are from the original image.
my sig one was done at home, i'll upload another i've done here at work now.
 
nikebee said:
because i'm using Macromedia Fireworks 8, which ironically is owned by Adobe... they got bought out... ;)
Click to expand...

Nice try. Stuff made in Fireworks 8 on my machine has Macromedia still in the generator name. ;)

The merger doesn't affect existing software. :)
 
Last edited:
nikebee said:
it's two layers,
original layer with parts coloured in, and then a second layer where which is just bits coloured in...
if i've missed anything out on either two layers then yes you get those pixels which are from the original image.
my sig one was done at home, i'll upload another i've done here at work now.
Click to expand...

lol, did you even read my post?


edit: in fact, lets this be the end of it, the thread has been fagged up enough already. Can we all agree to drop it? :)
 
iCraig said:
Nice try. Stuff made in Fireworks 8 on my machine has Macromedia still in the generator name. ;)
Click to expand...
not one mine?
i've only got a trail of Photoshop CS on my machine here, which has expired
tell me how to prove it and i'll do whatever you want.

http://www.projectTTA.com/gurdas.png

theres the png file i made IN FIREWORKS... ffs :rolleyes:

edit:
layers are as folows 2 text layers
1 original layer which has *some* colour on it, parts of the eyes and the forehead i believe
and a second layer which i've coloured in.
i've not used anything other than Fireworks 8 to create it :-/
 
Last edited:
I wanna see a bottle of coke on the top of your monitor and an icecube on your keyboard.

Got your V5 handy?
 
Zefan said:
I wanna see a bottle of coke on the top of your monitor and an icecube on your keyboard.

Got your V5 handy?
Click to expand...
i'll but some nos in it and put it next to the new merc i've just bought? :p
 
Last edited:
nikebee said:
not one mine?
i've only got a trail of Photoshop CS on my machine here, which has expired
tell me how to prove it and i'll do whatever you want.

http://www.projectTTA.com/gurdas.png

theres the png file i made IN FIREWORKS... ffs :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Correct. That version was made in Fireworks, or reprocessed. It was created today at.. oh.. 14:11.

It was originally made in Photoshop using filters. LOL it isn't really a crime mate, just stop digging and let's get back to the sig creations. :)
 
Kell_ee001 said:
We need rules -

You have to use MSPaint.
You have to start from scratch.

Anything else?
Click to expand...

Aye, you either paint a sig, or you shut the hell up. :p
 
iCraig said:
Correct. That version was made in Fireworks, or reprocessed. It was created today at.. oh.. 14:11.

It was originally made in Photoshop using filters. LOL it isn't really a crime mate, just stop digging and let's get back to the sig creations.
Click to expand...
yes thats when i saved the png, ffs and uploaded it :confused:
why do some people on here just look for things to poke at.
i've said yes, i cheated and yes i didn't use paint. its only done in fireworks and you've just looked at the PNG file to prove it :confused:
i admit that i cheated and used a program other than paint.
get the original picture of his sig, put my second layer on top of it... then finish the rest off yourself!
 
Tru said:
Aye, you either paint a sig, or you shut the hell up. :p
Click to expand...
its just annoying the amount of people on these forums that blatently accuse people of lying for no apparent reason.
i can't do anything else to prove that its only done in fireworks, if you name it i will do it!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom