Outraged!
But I've been reliably informed its actually a tuna sandwich so I'm OK with it. 
Liverpool Takeover Thread
- Thread starter antijoke
- Start date
Outraged!
But I've been reliably informed its actually a tuna sandwich so I'm OK with it. 
but then quickly changed to 
.
Soldato
FFS, it's all aimed at stalling the decision and you can bet your life none of these other offers are credible. If this carries on past next week it's time to boycott. His continued ownership it not in best interests of the club and he knows it. The club needs a ruling and it needs one fast. If they rule in favour of Hicks then RBS should call in the loan asap, 9 point deduction or otherwise.
Beggers belife. I think I'd like thingsto continue the way they are than be taken over by a hedge fund. They are determined to sink the club.
Last edited:
Wondering what RBS/Broughton's response to supposedly "rushing" will be. Whether they claim they did take fair time to consider all avenues, or that they incoming repayment date was an essential factor in getting it over and done with.
G&H claim the board meeting last Tuesday broke down when they US owners refused to continue "after a conversation with the chairman during the adjournment". They claim that the remaining three directors, Broughton, Purslow and Ayre formed a 'sub committee' which then considered the bids and after discussions with RBS decided to go with NESV.
"Resolution of the sub-committee is invalid because the English directors were in breach of the sales contract with RBS."
lol, are they seriously going to argue that? you can hardly say the board meeting 'doesnt count' because one party decide to storm out in a hissy-fit.
2.23pm: Hicks has written a letter to the court: He says that he and Gillett feel they "had become excluded from the sales process by the board"
Well, yeah its all the boards fault i guess. Has nothing to do with signing the veto-vote over to MB and then storming out of the meeting in which the board were going to discuss the sale process.
"Resolution of the sub-committee is invalid because the English directors were in breach of the sales contract with RBS."
lol, are they seriously going to argue that? you can hardly say the board meeting 'doesnt count' because one party decide to storm out in a hissy-fit.
2.23pm: Hicks has written a letter to the court: He says that he and Gillett feel they "had become excluded from the sales process by the board"
Well, yeah its all the boards fault i guess. Has nothing to do with signing the veto-vote over to MB and then storming out of the meeting in which the board were going to discuss the sale process.
Last edited:
Soldato
I'm starting to feel quite sick 
Moores and Parry should be put up in stocks outside Anfield every match day for selling to these morons.
Moores and Parry should be put up in stocks outside Anfield every match day for selling to these morons.
Last edited:
Hicks claims that the sub-committee became so ingrained that the directors started to refer to it as the "home team" in emails between themselves. One of which was accidentally sent to the owners at start of last week. Hicks claims that he only breached sales agreement by trying to oust two board members because the sub committee was a breach of the sales agreement in itself.
The idiot who forwarded the email should be sacked! Oh wait...
This whole thing will drag on for weeks. I can see administration being the only way out.
Soldato
Not a nice feeling but then i trun to hug one of cl trophies and feel better but then feel worse again when i realise that theren't that many more coming or that city are in better position to win it
Soldato
Me too. With the investment new owners will bring it will probably make very little difference to the final points tally this season anyway. If it's a choice between keep Hick or lose 9 points I'd happily take the later.
Here, here! Out with H&G asap...if not will someone please send the Liverpool underground round to sort them both out!
Associate
I don't think sending Merseyrail staff around will help much ......
Much discussion about Mill Financial: my understanding is that, via its lawyers, Mill Financial approached Liverpool recently but were told "the club had already been sold". It has been suggested (by Tom Stewart via email) that "Mill Financial is owned by US Billionaire Dwight Schar, Chairman of NVR and Co-Owner of the NFL Washington Redskins".
G&H QC, Paul Girolami, dismisses Friday's deadline and says that instead the owners and RBS are "locked into an agreement" until 1 November.
G&H QC, Paul Girolami, dismisses Friday's deadline and says that instead the owners and RBS are "locked into an agreement" until 1 November.
The suspense is killing me....please let it be good news!
