London Bridge Incident

fendi said:
who cares where to? wherever they are from originally. .
Click to expand...
what if they are from the UK?

fendi said:
whilst they are at it they should stop building mosks, .
Click to expand...

if done intentionally makes you look foolish and difficult to take seriously. if not done intentionally, you need to stay out of adult conversations.

fendi said:
and put a cap on how many kids a muslim family can have because with the way things are going the UK is doomed in the next 100+ years. in before religion is not a problem. wake up.
Click to expand...

how about we start with putting a cap on how many kids our 'own' - beginning with the persistently and joyfully unemployed baby factories, the chavs, the idiots - there's quite a list. let's birth rate cap them first, then we'll start looking elsewhere.
 
[/QUOTE]
deuse said:
I did say a fema styled camp. It will be built in the middle of nowhere. The inmates will have to farm the land for food like they do in some US prisons.

They will be kept in separate cells 23 hours a day. Again like they do in some US prisons.
Click to expand...


Oh right so you actually don't intend to build a basic camp that's designed to house large numbers of people efficency after a disaster or other such incident, but instead a super max prison where everyone is kept in solitary 23 hours a day?


That's kind of the rolex to FEMA camps cheap casio.


Out of curiosity though what are you going to do with them for the several years it would take to build such a facility?

Especially as this is the uk we do not have a "middle of no where" we have "within an hours walk of the nearest town".
 
Cleisthenes said:
Very sad, surprising that it's taken them so many days to find him considering they will likely have started looking immediately.
Click to expand...

I don't understand this, there's CCTV everywhere, why can't they see that the chap fell into the river?

Sounds incompetent that they've been unable to identfiy / trace people sooner.
 
Tefal said:
Oh right so you actually don't intend to build a basic camp that's designed to house large numbers of people efficency after a disaster or other such incident, but instead a super max prison where everyone is kept in solitary 23 hours a day?
Click to expand...


Why build a basic prison when\where they can all get together to cause trouble.

That's kind of the rolex to FEMA camps cheap casio.
Click to expand...

It sounds like you haven't got a clue.

Out of curiosity though what are you going to do with them for the several years it would take to build such a facility?

Especially as this is the uk we do not have a "middle of no where" we have "within an hours walk of the nearest town".
Click to expand...


Looks like you have never traveled the UK. Dartmoor has room and also Scottish highlands have space.
They can keep them in HM Prison Dartmoor till it's built. You will only have problems if you make them so.

But lets hear what you would do?
 
fendi said:
who cares where to? wherever they are from originally. how about that? we can even throw in a free first class ticket. whilst they are at it they should stop building mosks, and put a cap on how many kids a muslim family can have because with the way things are going the UK is doomed in the next 100+ years. in before religion is not a problem. wake up.
Click to expand...

A perfect example of how to make yourself look a cretin on the internet. Bravo.
 
Vonhelmet said:
"Many Christians"? The point is there are not as "many Christians" as you seem to think. If they wanted stricter churches they could find them. There's baptist churches and free churches out there that won't pull their punches, but no, they're struggling as well.

I think you're deluded about why Christianity is fading in this country.
Click to expand...

Yes "Many Christians" and *many Anglicans* do not leave Anglicanism just because the physical church is full of cultural marxism.
 
scorza said:
Maybe he's trying to suggest that people who made a living trying to help dangerous terrorists have no business being the Mayor of London.
Click to expand...

For argument sake maybe his time working closely with terrorists has given him huge insight in to how they operate and plan. I'm doubtful considering some of the stuff he's said over the years but you never know and if it was the case his efforts would be better focused inside the counter terrorist department.
 
pioneer2000 said:
If you walk up to a stranger and savagely stab them to death, then no it's fairly obvious you shouldn't have legal representation.

You should be tortured and executed.
Click to expand...

Due process for everyone, when you start to withdraw rights and erode a fair system it doesn't just affect those who admittedly don't deserve such rights but affects everyone.
 
Hitman_Leon said:
Due process for everyone, when you start to withdraw rights and erode a fair system it doesn't just affect those who admittedly don't deserve such rights but affects everyone.
Click to expand...

If everyone knows that upon committing such a crime (e.g. murder of innocent bystanders), you waive all rights to representation, it remains perfectly fair.
 
Vonhelmet said:
"Many Christians"? The point is there are not as "many Christians" as you seem to think. If they wanted stricter churches they could find them. There's baptist churches and free churches out there that won't pull their punches, but no, they're struggling as well.

I think you're deluded about why Christianity is fading in this country.
Click to expand...

The numbers of Christians (or atleast those regular attending a Christian place of worship) is higher than official figures in the UK - there are quite a few brethren groups where voting and even in some cases taking part in any kind of official survey is frowned on and/or about an estimated 60% won't actually identify themselves as Christian because they believe its a private thing or don't like to admit it, etc.
 
Rroff said:
The numbers of Christians (or atleast those regular attending a Christian place of worship) is higher than official figures in the UK - there are quite a few brethren groups where voting and even in some cases taking part in any kind of official survey is frowned on and/or about an estimated 60% won't actually identify themselves as Christian because they believe its a private thing or don't like to admit it, etc.
Click to expand...
Church attendance is down to about 5% of the population, and that's on a fairly loose definition of "attendance" (source: yougov). Weekly attendance is about 1m per week, though I forget the source of that. Even if you were to double either claim for people not responding as you say, they're both markedly less than any outlandish census claim of religious belief.

Christianity is at a very low ebb, whatever you think.
 
fendi said:
who cares where to? wherever they are from originally. how about that? we can even throw in a free first class ticket. whilst they are at it they should stop building mosks, and put a cap on how many kids a muslim family can have because with the way things are going the UK is doomed in the next 100+ years. in before religion is not a problem. wake up.
Click to expand...
There just isn't a facepalm big enough for this post lol.

What's a mosk by the way?? Or did you mean mosque??

So in essence you want to take away the rights of peaceful muslims to have their own places of worship, the ones who are happy to integrate into British life like myself.

Thank god none of your halfbrained ideas would ever get passed as law.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom