I doubt it would delay the election.
I suspect it might. All campaigning will be cancelled for a few days which would take you right up to the election.
I doubt it would delay the election.
Gotta love it when people compare Muslim terrorists to the IRA.
No. Im literally saying he doesnt know what this guy is thinking. Youre the one who made the sarcatic comment about thought police and yet are now saying he knows exactly what his friend is thinking.
Okay. Keep your secret evidence to yourself.
Btw I have evidence that the moon landings were fake. You should believe me.
Gotta love it when people compare Muslim terrorists to the IRA.
Not really. One large group is easy to track. Smaller discrete cells arent.
The Manchester guy was reported by muslims multiple times.
So please provide evidence to the contrary.
Extremist behaviour by definition is a minority. You don't deal with it by generalising.
No one is saying this gets ignored.
You simply don't ban a religion.
I suppose what's important is the % of the muslim community that condone violence in the name of islam.It will never happen, ISIS will turn in to something else and it will continue and will continue to be supported by certain sections of the muslim community within the UK & the rest of the world.
I'll repeat since you're struggling, I haven't assumed he's having any thoughts. You and him however are both assuming he's not having thoughts. Im the one pointing out you or him have no clue at all what his thoughts are.I'm saying he has a better idea of what his friend is thinking than you do. You don't know him. You've never met him. And yet you are assuming that he is thinking radical thoughts simply because he is Muslim.
Why should normal peaceful people have to defend themselves against thoughts they aren't even having due to the actions of a minority group?
Yea, fine, but at least you can take out basically an army of these people, if they seperate into smaller groups, that's better than one large group
No, smaller groups are worse than a large group, you have a chance of infiltrating a large group much less so a small group.
I'll repeat since you're struggling, I haven't assumed he's having any thoughts. You and him however are both assuming he's not having thoughts. Im the one pointing out you or him have no clue at all what his thoughts are.
I suppose what's important is the % of the muslim community that condone violence in the name of islam.
There will always be a-holes in society. A small number of white men will be neo-nazis. A small number of people will be kiddy fiddlers. A small number of muslims will have terrorist sympathies.
So long as the % really is small, there's nothing more you can do bar what we're already doing. Surveilling the people we believe are involved with extremism, and letting everybody else get on with their lives.
The question is, and here I don't know what to believe, what % of the muslim community is prepared to justify some form of violence in the name of their religion. And here I'm not just talking about terrorism. How many support spreading islam via violence - eg, islamic revolution in secular countries... etc, etc.
I'm hopeful that most muslims condemn ISIS and their brand of barbarity. But how many muslims would support islamic revolution in this country if there were a good chance of success?
I genuinely don't know, but it bothers me.
However that doesnt mean he doesnt have terrorist sympathies, does it?Well fortunately it's sheer probability that the guy isn't a terrorist.
So the onus is on you.
Do you understand the argument of evidence?However that doesnt mean he doesnt have terrorist sympathies, does it?
However that doesnt mean he doesnt have terrorist sympathies, does it?
However that doesnt mean he doesnt have terrorist sympathies, does it?