-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Lost Planet 2 Benchmark
- Thread starter Razor Time
- Start date
1920x1200, all max, game is set to 4xAA but I just noticed I have 8xAA in the CCC (not application controlled)
A scene 1 (cba to run the rest) - 43
B - 41.4
This one is another bench much like mafia 2 where you say "where did all that horsepower go!"
A scene 1 (cba to run the rest) - 43
B - 41.4
This one is another bench much like mafia 2 where you say "where did all that horsepower go!"
Associate
- Joined
- 22 Jul 2007
- Posts
- 1,396
- Location
- nottingham
First benchmark i got rank A 87.2 fps and thought o my this game looks real bad.
Second benchmark was running single figure fps so stopped the test and removed the pos from my hd.
Second benchmark was running single figure fps so stopped the test and removed the pos from my hd.
How can you go from Rank A to single digits? thats messed up.
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2010
- Posts
- 3,034
Sounds like a x-fire profile is needed for this game. SLI didnt work properly before the patch was released and if I forced SLI (alt1 or alt2) it also gave me single figures. No doubt ATI will updated their drivers for xfire and this game/demo. 
Soldato
- Joined
- 30 May 2009
- Posts
- 4,622
- Location
- Maidenhead
Going to try this on my GTX 275 for a laugh 
Should be interesting to see what it brings on DX9.
Should be interesting to see what it brings on DX9.
Couldn't get screenshots but results are below. I'm guessing this is quite heavily optimised for Nvidia cards, going by all the branding
Intel Core i5 750 & ATi 5850. 1680x1050, max detail, 4xAA.
DirectX 11
Test 1: 27.3
Test 2: 32.7
DirectX 9
Test 1: 67.9
Test 2: 56.3
Intel Core i5 750 & ATi 5850. 1680x1050, max detail, 4xAA.
DirectX 11
Test 1: 27.3
Test 2: 32.7
DirectX 9
Test 1: 67.9
Test 2: 56.3
Couldn't get screenshots but results are below. I'm guessing this is quite heavily optimised for Nvidia cards, going by all the branding
Intel Core i5 750 & ATi 5850. 1680x1050, max detail, 4xAA.
DirectX 11
Test 1: 27.3
Test 2: 32.7
DirectX 9
Test 1: 67.9
Test 2: 56.3
I got better scores than you did, yay.
No. The way it's meant to be played = Nvidia win.
I got better scores than you did, yay.
More or less the same
Did you have DX11 level on high as well? Its the option at the bottom of the list off the screen.My monitor while using a DVI cable does not allow me to use 1680x1050 so I've only got 1920x1080 results 
Test A:
Test B:
Even thought the fps was quite low it was actually quite smooth and I did not notice much lag or any slide show style scenes.
I think its time for a graphics card upgrade.
Test A:
Test B:
Even thought the fps was quite low it was actually quite smooth and I did not notice much lag or any slide show style scenes.
I think its time for a graphics card upgrade.
My monitor while using a DVI cable does not allow me to use 1680x1050 so I've only got 1920x1080 results
Test A:
Test B:
Even thought the fps was quite low it was actually quite smooth and I did not notice much lag or any slide show style scenes.
I think its time for a graphics card upgrade.
Not bad considering what card you have
DX9 looks better quality, just compare the water in the 1st screen shot between DX9 & DX 11, the monster's texture looks sharper too.
Pardon me? It's not like ATI is worse or much worse, they just have lesser tesselation capabilities. They're powerful enough to power any DirectX 11 game out there though and by the time some more demanding games pop up, ATI's mainstream range will nail in tessellation performance again. ATI cards are better suited for the market tbh.
/EOT
More or less the same
Dunno
Continuing the dispute about tessellation performance :
Radeon 5830 nailing GeForce 460 1GB? Sad times.
PS I know some charts are bull****. So is saying that Nvidia is MUCH better in tessellation than ATI. They are better but I wouldn't exaggerate. It's nowhere near 50% or something of this calibre. ATI ain't ****, period.
Last edited: