Luton airport...

Yes I know what, but that’s not what he implied in his original post.
He implied that crappy old diesel cars with plastic fuel tanks leak fuel.
They don’t.

This is the problem in GD though, when you question people the goalposts move so fast you can barely see them. Admitting you're wrong or misrepresented something is a lost art.
 
Almost certainly

The issue will be the expansion in a small area will cause contortion compared to the area around.

Don’t forget at the point you have hundreds of burning cars the heat is coming from multiple sources and not just the fuel. That kind of heat will weaken metal beams causing a structural failure.

That wasn't really meant to be a serious question :p
 
Yes I know what, but that’s not what he implied in his original post.
He implied that crappy old diesel cars with plastic fuel tanks leak fuel.
They don’t.
'Implied' Ie, you've read what you wanted to.

Crappy old diesel cars. Poorly maintained, end of life, prone to issues - some of those issues causing fires.
With plastic fuel tanks, that in the event of a fire, will melt and leak fuel greatly increasing the spread of the fire.
 
My question would be is a metal fuel tank going to prevent this spread?

yes the older metal cars are better off (maybe from perspective of less plastics generally too?) - read the merseyside car park report where I took the quote from,

think the petrol fuel vapor is pretty explosive, for damaging the car park structure,
article suggest water sprinklers don't suppress vapour , which firemans foam can do ... guess they couldn't deploy some of the fire engines from the airport.
 
'Implied' Ie, you've read what you wanted to.

Crappy old diesel cars. Poorly maintained, end of life, prone to issues - some of those issues causing fires.
With plastic fuel tanks, that in the event of a fire, will melt and leak fuel greatly increasing the spread of the fire.
I’ve read exactly what you’ve written.
Anyhoo, chuck the shovel up when you’ve finished with it.
 
I think the reason they moved to plastic was partly that old steel tanks would rust. Both internally and externally and would eventually fail.
It was reasonably well known you never used the bottom bit of fuel when you had metal tanks in an old car.
Getting someone to fix one was a nightmare, basically impossible, so you ended up needing a new tank.

So old cars with metal tanks may well be far more likely to be an issue, where as new ones would likely be safer than plastic in a fire.
 
Really. It’s been the cause of all the major car park fires recently.
Got any proof?
I literally just linked to one.
Your link doesn't say that diesel is causing more fires though, which is what I asked.
Ur, no. You asked if there's any proof it's causing major car park fires.


This is the problem in GD though, when you question people the goalposts move so fast you can barely see them. Admitting you're wrong or misrepresented something is a lost art.
How about, people are hypocrites?
 
Last edited:
Isn't diesel really difficult to ignite?
Yup, it will put out a match if you try and ignite it.

In fact back before they started making fuel tanks out of plastic the standard way to safely weld a crack/hole in a petrol tank was to pour a litre of diesel in, slosh it about and hey presto you can weld the tank without risk of a fire/explosion.
 
yes the older metal cars are better off (maybe from perspective of less plastics generally too?) - read the merseyside car park report where I took the quote from,

think the petrol fuel vapor is pretty explosive, for damaging the car park structure,
article suggest water sprinklers don't suppress vapour , which firemans foam can do ... guess they couldn't deploy some of the fire engines from the airport.
Vapour Cloud Explosions (VCEs) can cause extreme structural damage due the over-pressure they exert on walls/floors etc.
 
One of the issues with modern diesel engines is the huge fuel pressure in the piping of the engine bay.
2,000 BAR – 29,000 PSI

"Common rail direct fuel injection is a direct fuel injection system for petrol and diesel engines. On diesel engines, it features a high-pressure (2,000 BAR – 29,000 PSI) fuel rail feeding individual solenoid valves, as opposed to a low-pressure fuel pump feeding unit injectors or pump nozzles"

Not only will this propel diesel through body parts, likely to induce the need for long periods of surgery or even amputations, the pressure will find *all and any* weakness due to age, rust, vibration / pulsation induced cracking of lines and fittings, or simply due to people having worked on them incorrectly. Once these systems spring a leak that ignites you have a superb flame thrower running under the bonnet. (HINT: Think carefully before lifting the bonnet with your Halfords fire extinguisher in hand, it might be wise not to look....) For sure, shut down the engine at the ignition switch first. DO NOT open the bonnet if the engine's still running and generating fuel pressure from its usually mechanically driven high pressure pump!! Modern tech ehh? ;)
 
Last edited:
I literally avoid Luton as a place to fly from with a passion. Even if the holiday is cheaper. I will either fly from Stansted or East Midlands. Always had good experiences with both. Luton airport not so much. I can't quite put my finger on it but always felt dodgy and the journey to it has always been a nightmare.
 
Last edited:
Once these systems spring a leak that ignites you have a superb flame thrower running under the bonnet. (HINT: Think carefully before lifting the bonnet with your Halfords fire extinguisher in hand, it might be wise not to look....)
Well, that's clearly nonsense because....
lol you've got as much chance of water catching fire as you do diesel
 
Back
Top Bottom