1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

LuxMark 2.0 Bench Thread

Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by LtMatt, Apr 30, 2014.

  1. LtMatt

    Caporegime

    Joined: Jul 12, 2007

    Posts: 31,779

    Location: United Kingdom

    Scoreboard updated. :)

    What's up with your 7970?

    :D
     
  2. ~Mike~

    Sgarrista

    Joined: Jan 17, 2011

    Posts: 8,737

    Location: the King's city

    Nothing :p:D. Badly worded post, the pc is in bits. :o
     
  3. GoogalyMoogaly

    Soldato

    Joined: Aug 29, 2010

    Posts: 6,954

    Location: Cornwall

    What is impressive with the Titans is how well they do considering the number of compute units they have. Just comparing Kaap's scores, the 290X has 44 compute units and the Titans have 14.

    I'm sure it doesn't scale like this, but that means, per compute unit:

    LuxBall HDR Single Benchmark
    Titan compute unit = 1410.6
    290X compute unit = 568.5

    Sala Medium Benchmark
    Titan compute unit = 186.3
    290X compute unit = 77.5

    Room Complex Benchmark
    Titan compute unit = 92.0
    290X compute unit = 39.2

    Actually that'd be interesting, at the same clocks do the 290Xs score 10% better than a 290? How close is the correlation between compute units and score (if clock speeds are the same)?

    Also, is it me or do the links next to Kaap's Titan results not work correctly? Is that how much LtMatt hates Nvidia, he won't even link to their results? :)
     
  4. Silent_Scone

    Capodecina

    Joined: Sep 5, 2011

    Posts: 12,405

    Location: Surrey

    Sala bench

    Two 780Ti 1300/1800

    4960 @ 4.5

    [​IMG]

    Did a double take on settings. OpenCL GPU only, Scene Sala Medium?
     
    Last edited: May 1, 2014
  5. Silent_Scone

    Capodecina

    Joined: Sep 5, 2011

    Posts: 12,405

    Location: Surrey

    Room benchmark

    Two 780Ti @ 1300/1800

    4960 @ 4.5

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: May 1, 2014
  6. Silent_Scone

    Capodecina

    Joined: Sep 5, 2011

    Posts: 12,405

    Location: Surrey

    Luxball HDR Benchmark

    Two 780Ti @ 1300/1800

    4960 @ 4.5

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: May 1, 2014
  7. GoogalyMoogaly

    Soldato

    Joined: Aug 29, 2010

    Posts: 6,954

    Location: Cornwall

    If nothing else these recent Nvidia entries have made me realise that Humbug and I have different interpretations of "blow Nvidia into the dark ages" :D
    I realise that a decently clocked 290X will probably beat these scores and Kaap's 290Xs soundly beat his Titans, but still, given Humbug's comments I was expecting Nvidia results to be about half what they have been so far.

    I was wondering if it would be much the same as the difference between AMD and Nvidia cards with the recent cryptocoin mining. Not knowing much about mining I wondered if the mining stuff used a lot of Compute Units. From these results I'm guessing not.

    From another benchmark thread:
     
  8. Silent_Scone

    Capodecina

    Joined: Sep 5, 2011

    Posts: 12,405

    Location: Surrey

    I came in for the hell of it, but pleasantly surprised. Plenty left in the tank too. I'll leave the single / 3 GPU boards alone for now :D
     
  9. whyscotty

    Sgarrista

    Joined: May 6, 2012

    Posts: 9,396

    Location: Wigan

    Nice scores Mr Frosty :D
     
  10. Geeman1979

    Soldato

    Joined: Feb 14, 2011

    Posts: 7,490

    Luxball HDR Benchmark.

    Titan (x2) @ 1150/1700

    3930k @ 4.5

    Will have a tinker tomorrow if I get time.

    [​IMG]
     
  11. whyscotty

    Sgarrista

    Joined: May 6, 2012

    Posts: 9,396

    Location: Wigan

    3930K@4.4 - - Sli Titan 1254/1877

    [​IMG]

    Titan @ 1333/1877

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2014
  12. Silent_Scone

    Capodecina

    Joined: Sep 5, 2011

    Posts: 12,405

    Location: Surrey

    Love a good awkward silence :p
     
  13. LtMatt

    Caporegime

    Joined: Jul 12, 2007

    Posts: 31,779

    Location: United Kingdom

    Scoreboard updated. :)

    Nice scores Frosty. I'm sure now the Nvidia users will start flooding in. :D
     
  14. Silent_Scone

    Capodecina

    Joined: Sep 5, 2011

    Posts: 12,405

    Location: Surrey

    Ta, hope not as that means I might have to do some faster runs :D
     
  15. Kaapstad

    Man of Honour

    Joined: May 21, 2012

    Posts: 28,208

    Location: Dalek flagship

    Just looking at the scores, why are people getting bad 2 card CF scaling ?
     
  16. Silent_Scone

    Capodecina

    Joined: Sep 5, 2011

    Posts: 12,405

    Location: Surrey

    The bench doesn't use Crossfire, there isn't any scaling :)
     
  17. Kaapstad

    Man of Honour

    Joined: May 21, 2012

    Posts: 28,208

    Location: Dalek flagship

    That's what I mean, they should be getting close to 100% but they are not.
     
  18. the1gooner

    Wise Guy

    Joined: Sep 8, 2009

    Posts: 2,259

    Location: Swindon

    Single Gigabyte Windforce 290X : 1175 / 1625 (6500) +100mv
    Driver Version 13.12
    i7 4770K : 4.4Ghz
    Windows 8.1

    LuxBall HDR : 25,005

    [​IMG]

    Room : 1,714

    [​IMG]

    Sala : 3,583

    [​IMG]

    All first run scores if that makes a difference.
     
  19. Kaapstad

    Man of Honour

    Joined: May 21, 2012

    Posts: 28,208

    Location: Dalek flagship

    2 x 290Xs @1250/1625

    4930k @4.8

    14.4 beta

    Luxball
    [​IMG]


    Sala
    [​IMG]


    Room
    [​IMG]
     
  20. Silent_Scone

    Capodecina

    Joined: Sep 5, 2011

    Posts: 12,405

    Location: Surrey

    Hhhhrrrrnnnnnnn

    :D