More pro Avery propoganda. The antithesis of unbiased documentary film-making, whose sole purpose is to convince millions of gullible couch potatoes that a guilty man is innocent.
More pro Avery propoganda. The antithesis of unbiased documentary film-making, whose sole purpose is to convince millions of gullible couch potatoes that a guilty man is innocent.
A bit like the first time he was convicted. Stupid gullible jury!!
Had they thrown away the key, Teresa Halbach would still be breathing and Avery would still be where he should have been the whole time.
Personally I think it shows how powerful the press and media can be. It gives quiet a slanted view on things from what I can tell, which could be why there are all these protesters etc as they've just watched the Netflix show and think that clearly he's innocent.
Tbh, I can't remember season 1 all that well now. What was his first conviction?
I believe that the new season will focus more on Brendan Dassey but I'm very jaded by series one. I felt like a complete idiot that I had given this the time of day when I started doing my own research.
Netflix allowed the makers to completely re-frame the truth by omitting swathes of evidence that if you read the count documents make clear why Avery was convicted.
Clearly he was not responsible for the original rape, clearly he was responsible for the 2003 murder.
Hopefully the new season will hold it's hands up and address it's dishonesty and put the record straight.
Can you link to any of this evidence??
Never let the truth get in the way of a good story:
http://stevenaverycase.com/what-making-a-murderer-didnt-tell-you/
(I was guilty of pooing my pants as a baby but I don't now) and so the rest goes, etc etc
An underage female relative of Avery's accused him of sexually assaulting her, describing how he pinned her arms down and raped her,
Because past transgressions are not evidence, simple.If you think that's the same as...
Then yeah, we probably shouldn't bother going on. Not that it makes everything else true, but your example is not a good one as to why it should be ignored.
The point being, LOTS of stuff was ignored for a reason.
I don't believe this series will bring up much more evidence that proves it wasn't him. Its more than.likely just going to be the appeals made to seems like new evidence. Clearly didn't work as he's still in jail and always will be. Imagine the uproar of the government got it wrong twice and were complicit. Never gona happen.