Man and dinosaurs, when did we first know about them?

I dont know whos taking the mick in this thread and who is generally clueless, which for a retard of my calibre, i find disturbing.
 
kedge said:
Can you prove they didn't?
Click to expand...

the burden of proof is on those who think they did, not the other way around, because all current evidence suggests that they did not. It's the same as the "prove there isn't a god" muppets - no. the burden of proof is not on those who believe there isn't (a) god/s, you need to show me evidence to suggest there is.

But every time you do it gets shot down, you think it's because people don't understand, but it isn't - it's because the evidence is **** awful

B@
 
Last edited:
B@Th*nG said:
the burden of proof is on those who think they did, not the other way around, because all current evidence suggests that they did not.
Click to expand...
Evidence that you have chosen yes but why should anyone believe what evolutionary paleontologists say?. Many animals live where man does not inhabit so that could explain why you don't see any human bones with dinosaur bones or fossils. The point is no doubt in my mind ist has been crafted that way by evolutionists. Also, there is no real proof that dinosaurs are millions of years old, it's just what evolutionists claim.
 
Last edited:
kedge said:
Why do they have to be found together? and what exactly does that prove?.
Click to expand...

If fossils of animals are found in the same rock layer it means that they were alive during the same era. Because you can date the rocks, you can date when the animals were alive. There is about a 65m year gap between the layers dinosaurs are found and the layers in which humans are found.
 
Spook187 said:
looooooooool

Just like that eh!! POW, man just appeared just like that did he :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Yeah it's the same when evolutionists say that life just magically appeared and that life can come from inert lifeless dead matter, which by the way life can only come from pre-existing life and that of it's kind, so, you have a problem there.
 
RDM said:
If fossils of animals are found in the same rock layer it means that they were alive during the same era. Because you can date the rocks, you can date when the animals were alive. There is about a 65m year gap between the layers dinosaurs are found and the layers in which humans are found.
Click to expand...
All in your opinion you have zero proof that rocks are indeed millions of years old, all known dating methods spit out erroneous dates, there are no known exact absolute dates, much is based on evolutionary assumptions.
 
kedge said:
All in your opinion you have zero proof that rocks are indeed millions of years old, all known dating methods spit out erroneous dates, there are no known exact absolute dates, much is based on evolutionary assumptions.
Click to expand...

Dating of rock layers has absolutely nothing to do with evolution, it is a completely separate field of science. Sadly you will need to think of a new pithy name for those that "believe" in geology as geologist already has a meaning...
 
kedge said:
Yeah it's the same when evolutionists say that life just magically appeared and that life can come from inert lifeless dead matter, which by the way life can only come from pre-existing life and that of it's kind, so, you have a problem there.
Click to expand...

science doesn't claim to have all the answers, that's what science is - an understanding of the environment to the best of our knowledge using provable methodology. it's constantly changing and adapting to what best suits our current understanding. But if you think that means they're are going to look at the question "What is the origin of life?", not know the exact answer, and be happy with "a magic man did it" then you're mistaken. What a difficult question is to a scientist is motivation.

So i don't have a problem there, I have motivation for new understanding, not proof of something supernatural.

kedge said:
All in your opinion you have zero proof that rocks are indeed millions of years old, all known dating methods spit out erroneous dates, there are no known exact absolute dates, much is based on evolutionary assumptions.
Click to expand...

for what benefit though? why are people making these "assumptions"? to intentionally dispute the existence of god? do me a lemon! you think there are that many people with ego enough to care about that? it's not even a consideration. You can't just bury your head in the sand and say "all these people are wrong because it doesn't fit my doctrine" when you have literally nothing in argument other than "they don't really know" - it's really very sad

B@
 
Last edited:
There are pictures of madusa and half men half lions or sphinxes etc are we saying that because they are recorded that they existed?

According to the ace programme ancient aliens we are told that aliens created half man half animal creations through genetic splicing or through transplants. Hello minotaur !
 
Kedge, do you take off your tinfoil hat when you go to bed or is it just permanently stapled to your cranium ? :rolleyes:
 
ITT: People who believe an 800yr old version of a fairytale, translated multiple times and written by completely unknown authors over several hundred years apart, from stories dictated from the memory of illiterate people who used ancient languages and dialects. Actually forced to believe it under duress so their magical imaginary friend who lives in the sky will send them to a wonderful special place but only when they die.

-Vs.-

People who are not bat-**** crazy.

Also, are there dinosaurs in heaven? :cool:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom