Man ‘team-killed and virtually 'teabagged' female journalist during shocking in-game rampage

d_brennen said:
Really, Jasper Hailmill of the Metro? If this isn't an epic troll he really needs to go and get a real job in the real world
Click to expand...

He has gained a load of clicks and shares on an article he has posted. The article is pure click bait and even though it is a load of dross I'm sure they are loving the exposure. People don't seem to realise that websites love these articles as it generates so much buzz, good or bad.
 
Flibster said:
So....

They wanted equality... they've got it...

No problem then.
Click to expand...


They (a currently powerful subset of 'feminists') don't want equality the want 'power'....but don't take it just from me take it from Labour MP Stella Creasy...........

'feminism isn't about women its about power'
Click to expand...

(a rather telling slip on national TV)


(10 minutes and 5 seconds in)


They believe in aspects of a certain failed ideology whereby there is an oppressor class with the 'power' (men in this case) and an oppressed class without power (women here) any evidence that runs contrary to this narrative can be dismissed out of hand.

The seek to institute systemic change to introduce actual discrimination based on whatever their perceived oppressor/ oppressed dynamic is (in this case based on gender or sex) to counteract the perceived 'injustice' they claims is present in the current system (which is often a very vague nebulous concept that often doesn't stand up to any sort of universal wider review of factors)

They don't want equal treatment for women they seek preferential treatment for women
 
It's not really a slip, I don't think it's a secret that feminists would love more women in positions of power. No movement wants to rely on other people to bring about change, it kind of defeats the point as they'll still be relying on men to achieve equality.

It's kind of why they have all female meetings about empowering each other and making sure they're acting in the best interests of other women. Pretty much all groups do this (immigrants, LGBT+, religious groups etc.)
 
explicit4u said:
It's not really a slip, I don't think it's a secret that feminists would love more women in positions of power. No movement wants to rely on other people to bring about change, it kind of defeats the point as they'll still be relying on men to achieve equality.

It's kind of why they have all female meetings about empowering each other and making sure they're acting in the best interests of other women. Pretty much all groups do this (immigrants, LGBT+, religious groups etc.)
Click to expand...

White supremacists, Nazis, terrorists etc.

It's common to all ideologies which are based on group identity, group advocacy and thus preferential treatment for that group identity. Most of them "justify" it by labelling other group identities (preferably just one group identity - the "not us" group identity) as the cause of all bad things. Some versions of the ideology target jews, some target communists, some target "non-whites", some target men, some target the bourgeoisie, etc, etc. Same basic ideology of group identity and advocacy, different chosen group identities. Different strains of the ideology are fashionable at different times and places. But it's the same basic ideology all the way - group advocacy and thus group identity. And it's always, always, about power.
 
explicit4u said:
It's not really a slip, I don't think it's a secret that feminists would love more women in positions of power. No movement wants to rely on other people to bring about change, it kind of defeats the point as they'll still be relying on men to achieve equality.

It's kind of why they have all female meetings about empowering each other and making sure they're acting in the best interests of other women. Pretty much all groups do this (immigrants, LGBT+, religious groups etc.)
Click to expand...

Yet if a white man was to have such a meeting...
 
Anyone else thinking this could possibly be a good bit of advertising for an average looking portal FPS rip off?

Get's all the gamers on the side of the devs.
 
#paymetoo..... Are these people serious?!

I'm really sick of this gender pay gap nonsense. It's all a load of rubbish. It might be an issue for people in the public eye. But I haven't seen any of them come out complaining about it.... If you feel you deserve more money. Demand it. Simple as...

And as for the teabagging...... LOLs
 
VincentHanna said:
Somehow this thread ended up equating feminists with white supremacists, nazis and terrorists.
Click to expand...

No, it didn't. It increased the list of group advocates calling for more power for their favoured group from only fashionably prejudiced ones to also unfashionably prejudiced ones. The point being that group advocacy isn't a good thing. Some strains of it are fashionable in various times and places, but that doesn't make it a good thing. There's no fundamental difference, for example, between feminism and whitism. Both are biological group advocacy ideologies. Both require belief in biological group identity. Both advocate for their favoured group identity and both blame society, government, businesses and, of course, their target group identity. Both cover the whole range of irrational prejudice from dismissal to hatred. Both include outright supremacists. Same thing, different group.
 
VincentHanna said:
Somehow this thread ended up equating feminists with white supremacists, nazis and terrorists.
Click to expand...

Some how you needed to summarise a post up in one sentence to make it sound ridiculous and disregard the point. Instead why not try debating actual points you disagree with
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom