Deleted member 651465
Deleted member 651465
Is manual handling picking stuff up?
Anything that requires pushing, pulling, lifting etc. To answer you in a word, yes.
The weight in question is 5Kg according to company paperwork.
The weight that needs to be moved around, including up and down flights of stairs, varies from 2.5Kg to 50Kg depending on which department you're working on and how busy it is. The weight is in coins, so while an outgoing float is a fixed weight (up to 20Kg) the amount that needs to be taken back in one go varies a great deal (up to 50Kg, but usually no more than 30Kg). Personally, I find it a problem. My knee is damaged (probably by the job, since chronic musculo-skeletal problems are a well known health and safety issue caused by company policy) and stairs are painful even without any weight.
Try this.. http://www.hse.gov.uk/MSd/mac/scoresheet.htm and see the guidance sheet.. http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg383.pdf
Using the figures from the OP (36kg unistrut, 6m carry distance) I come up with scores that pretty much tell me this task carries a high level of risk. This mostly due to the carry distance, the obstacles and the load instability but still, you'd have a hard time arguing this in court with those scores.
In instances where the load changes with every lift, I would sit and watch someone carrying for an hour and with a stopwatch write down the lifting times, carry distances etc, then work out an average. It may be impossible for you to do this on you job, but using rough averages you could probably tell if a job required further assessment. From what you say about employees knowingly developing MSD (musculo skeletal disorders) then obviously you already know the answer.

That may well be true on paper, but in practice it isn't. I'm fairly familiar with relevant law and company policy and thus fairly familiar with several ways my employer isn't compliant with it and it doesn't matter.
It does matter. You may feel that they are invincible because they haven't been caught out, but one day it'll bite them and the enforcement authority would come down on them like a tonne of bricks. No pun intended.
Sure, I could complain and lose my job. How would that benefit me? I couldn't afford to take them to court (you have to pay nowadays, part of this government's reforms) and even if I could do so and I did win, I still wouldn't have a job. It's a big gamble for someone in my position (as very many people are).
I'm risking my job merely by making this post. Saying anything at all critical of the company is grounds for dismissal, even if it is true.
This is the way of the world. Trouble-makers are managed out of the business whenever a perceived "fuss" is caused. This isn't a new concept when it comes to H&S, and I totally empathize with this but at the end of the day, would you rather raise your concerns and be made redundant or crippled in a workplace incident?
It is a bit odd how selective they are. In some areas, they are absolutely all over the slightest H&S issue. I wasn't joking earlier when I said there are regular formal risk assessments for using washing up liquid. Even using a different brand will trigger a new risk assessment. The COSHH file is a couple of feet thick.
I know. I work for the NHS and part of my role is to manage the CoSHH assessments. You wan't to see the files for the Histopathology or the Microbiology departments!
I'll stress sgain that my employer is relatively good in the way it treats its bottom-end employees. At least I don't have to haul very unwieldy heavy weights up many flights of stairs, for example.
Fearful of litigation I would guess / perhaps they aren't as naive as you think?
Last edited by a moderator: