Maths Help Please

[Ricochet J]

It's easier to remember the method of completing the square rather than the quadratic formula, is what I was alluding to.

Yeh true I guess. But anyone here reading this if you get stuck in the exam and forget the quadtric formula then just complete the square of ax^s+bx+c=0

We're finding turning points!

Sure we are That topic finished around 20 posts ago

On a slightly different note but still taking into consideration of calculus, if it were a quadtratic inequality and he wanted to find the solutions would definate integration between points p and q suffice?

 

[spirit]

i don't understand what you mean eXSBass, can you clarify?

 

[Omicron]

I love how these threads always get more complicated than they need to

Symmetry eh? Sounds like you need to find the irreducible subalgebra isomorphic to SU(2n-1) where n is the number of compactified dimensions within the killing form of the diffeomorphism!*

Been doing bloody fourier transforms all morning.

Properly or doing what slacker engineering students do, looking them up in tables?

Given the original poster is clearly of a level where solving quadratics is the name of the game, I think differentiation was clearly going to not be something they have come across. Completing the square would have been the more appropriate answer I would say.

* The terms have meaning, but not related to one another, I just wanted to sound pointlessly complicated

 

[daz]

Properly or doing what slacker engineering students do, looking them up in tables?

Properly, there's a lot to remember.

 

[Arcade Fire]

Symmetry eh? Sounds like you need to find the irreducible subalgebra isomorphic to SU(2n-1) where n is the number of compactified dimensions within the killing form of the diffeomorphism!*

That's just silly. SU(2n-1) is a group, not an algebra. Noob