Maths problem - how do you solve it.

Arcade Fire said:
I'm pretty trashed now, but bookmarking this for tomorrow because I couldn't work it out in the couple of minutes that I stared at it, which probably means that it's hard - and therefore interesting. ;)
comeon arcade fire,,, you're from Cambridge!!! show 'em what were made of!!
 
Angus-Higgins said:
Isn't it 60 degrees?:

(180-30-x) = 150-x
150-x+20 = 170-x
180-(170-x) = 10+x
10+x = 180-x-50
10+2x = 130
2x=120
x=60

(All values are in degrees).

Is this correct?

Angus Higgins
I don't think it is; or else I've not seen something that you've seen. Your second and third lines are irrelevant - they evaluate to 0=0. I don't see where you've got the fourth line from. I think you've made a mistake and assumed that an angle which is equal to 10+x is the same as one which is equal to 130-x (which gives you the answer of x=60).

Edit: I see you edited your answer away :p
 
Last edited:
Arcade Fire said:
I'm pretty trashed now, but bookmarking this for tomorrow because I couldn't work it out in the couple of minutes that I stared at it, which probably means that it's hard - and therefore interesting. ;)
Pfft. The true geniuses I met at uni were better at maths when trashed. You fail sir.
 
Arcade Fire said:
I think you've made a mistake and assumed that an angle which is equal to 10+x is the same as one which is equal to 130-x (which gives you the answer of x=60).

Edit: I see you edited your answer away :p

Yeah, I spotted that. I am too tired for this I think. :p (But it is fun).

Angus Higgins
 
divine_madness said:
I do have a solution if anyone wants to see it :p


It's quite complicated, if you're tired I don't think you'll get it anytime soon :/


edit - on second inspection, the solution i found is for a subtley different problem, not sure if it still applies, I can post it anyway if people want?
 
divine_madness said:
It's quite complicated, if you're tired I don't think you'll get it anytime soon :/


edit - on second inspection, the solution i found is for a subtley different problem, not sure if it still applies, I can post it anyway if people want?

put me out of my bloody misery (please and thank you :p)
 
SOLUTION - SPOILER, SKIP PAST IF YOU DON'T WANT TO KNOW.














































1- Make a parallel to AB from D. DF parallel to AB
2- AF and DB intersects at the point O, the parallel logic makes that BAF = 60 = ABD = AFD = FDB, and also CFD = CBA = 80
3- Take a look at the triangle ABE. If we try to find the point G, which is the centre of the circle in which this triangle inserts, we get: GE = GA = GB.
By simple mathematics calculate: GÂB = GBA = a
GAE = GEA = b
GEB = GBE = c
a+a+b+b+c+c (the sum of the angles of the triangle ABE) = 180
a+b+c = 90
a+b = BAE = 70
b+c = AEB =30
c+a = EBA = 80
a+b+c = 70+c=90
so, c = 20, a = 60 , and b = 10

(If you draw the lines and see the points it'll be very easy…)
So, the centre of this triangle G forms GAB = GBA = 60. We can see that this point coincides with the point O, in fact G =O. so we have now, O , previously drawn , is the centre of this triangle AEB, so OE = OA = OB

4- We had already, BEO = 20 (the c angle) = FEO
The angle AFC = CFD + DFA = 80 + 60 =140
So in the triangle FEO, we have, 140, 20 and the last angle to find, FOE = 20
So FOE is an isosceles triangle, so, FO = FE
5- We have the triangle ODF, equilateral one (all 60 degrees) so OF =OD =DF
6- From 4 and 5 we can deduce that, FE = FD, isosceles triangle with EFD = 80, so each of FED = FDE = 50 degrees.
7- FED = FEA + (our famous angle) so, 50 = 30 + (our famous angle, I'll call it x, or AED)
8- x = 20 degrees.


proof.png
















































END SOLUTION
 
PanMaster said:
But x = 60 because its an equilateral triangle.
No. 60 is an angle which x just cannot be.
Simple application of the circle theorems demonstrates this.

Label the main triangle ABC, with A at the top, and B at bottom left,
and then put D between A and B, and E between A and C.

If x = 60, then angle CDE would equal angle CBE, and so DECB would be a cyclic quadrilateral.

However, angle ECD is not equal to angle EBD, and so DECB cannot be a cyclic quadrilateral.

Hence x cannot be 60.


Arcade Fire said:
Hey Howard - haven't seen you for a good while! How's tricks?
Doing well thanks, Arcade Fire. Good to see you again. Not here as much as I used to be. Spend most of the summer away from home. Just back here for a few days, and saw this thread which looked interesting.
 
Back
Top Bottom