Soldato
- Joined
- 1 May 2013
- Posts
- 9,918
- Location
- M28
Think humbug has a problem with people called Steve. He bangs on about Gamers Nexus and now picking on the unboxed chap
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
MB VRMs: do they matter more than features?
- Thread starter humbug
- Start date
Think humbug has a problem with people called Steve. He bangs on about Gamers Nexus and now picking on the unboxed chap
Think humbug has a problem with people called Steve. He bangs on about Gamers Nexus and now picking on the unboxed chap
You can always go elsewhere for your reviews if you don't like the priorities Hardware Unboxed, Gamers Nexus etc have on their reviews. There are other reviewers who don't put so much weight on overclocking / "enthusiast" features. Simple enough.
You're missing the point, deliberately i think.
"Features" tend to mean very little to me.
I'm very happy to buy a basic board with excellent VRM's at £90-120 or so, I'm not at all bothered about how many SATA ports or fan headers I have. I don't care about things such as 'quality' onboard audio, I run external products for that sort of thing.
If someone wants to buy a board with more 'features' instead of being focused on VRM's I don't see why there isn't room for both.
I do have a problem with bottom of the barrel motherboards claiming to support the likes of a 3950X however, and there's a few of them out there. Hell, there's a few that throttle with octa-cores when under load even at stock values.
I'm very happy to buy a basic board with excellent VRM's at £90-120 or so, I'm not at all bothered about how many SATA ports or fan headers I have. I don't care about things such as 'quality' onboard audio, I run external products for that sort of thing.
If someone wants to buy a board with more 'features' instead of being focused on VRM's I don't see why there isn't room for both.
I do have a problem with bottom of the barrel motherboards claiming to support the likes of a 3950X however, and there's a few of them out there. Hell, there's a few that throttle with octa-cores when under load even at stock values.
Not at all, I'm struggling to understand why you seem to not get the concept of Hardware Unboxed, Gamers Nexus catering for their primary audience.
As said in my original comment in this thread, you've done the correct thing and taken onboard the information provided, decided that the sub par VRM's will not be an issue for you, and made your purchasing decision based on that.
Nope, I'd say for sure. The simple fact that you used "sub par VRMs" in your comment shows the point has totally passed you by.
OP, which specific video are you referring to where Hardware Unboxed state that the ASRock AB350 Pro 4 is "junk, don't buy it"?
In this video (note the title) he rates it as the 2nd best ultra cheap B350M board, with the non Pro 4 being first by virtue of it being cheaper, but noting that if you're using a G series Ryzen then the Pro 4 is the one to get due to the additional outputs, or if you specifically need any of the additional IO.
In this video (note the title) he rates it as the 2nd best ultra cheap B350M board, with the non Pro 4 being first by virtue of it being cheaper, but noting that if you're using a G series Ryzen then the Pro 4 is the one to get due to the additional outputs, or if you specifically need any of the additional IO.
Try and find a £70 to £90 B550 Board, even the B350 and B450 Tomahawk boards everyone thought were good all round board were sub £100, they had 4 phase VRMs. For under £100 of course they did.
Try and find that now with B550... but they all have better VRMs.
The original X570 Tomahawk was £180, i think it soon came down to £160, the cheapest X570 you could get, or one of... it didn't pass the Steve test, MSI withdrew it and promised to fix it, which they did, they added a much beefier VRM, and £60 to the price, Steve was pretty pleased with himself.
Try and find that now with B550... but they all have better VRMs.
The original X570 Tomahawk was £180, i think it soon came down to £160, the cheapest X570 you could get, or one of... it didn't pass the Steve test, MSI withdrew it and promised to fix it, which they did, they added a much beefier VRM, and £60 to the price, Steve was pretty pleased with himself.
I think the issue with the B550 and X570 boards was that they basically created a new product tier in the same way as Intel were doing and nVidia were doing. If you still want the old feature set and old VRMs B450 boards are still available. B550 didn't obselete B450 like it should have, they just put it in a tier above B450 and offered both. Same with what should be mid range GPUs now priced like they are the high end of old. Happens with everything, they don't shuffle the lineup down anymore, they just create more and more tiers on the top.
Isn't the problem actually just heatsinking anyway? I'd rather a board manufacturer spent money on a heatsink than on some neon light show, or oversized io shield cover etc.
Isn't the problem actually just heatsinking anyway? I'd rather a board manufacturer spent money on a heatsink than on some neon light show, or oversized io shield cover etc.
With Zen, it depends what you actually men by "overclocked". Enabling PBO for instance, is an overclock (the wording in the bios tells you that). Setting a multi above stock is an overclock.
There is only one thing that isn't an overclock and that is leaving the bios at stock. It could be argued that setting the bios to motherboard limits is also an overclock, i don't see that argument that way at all. Setting motherboard limits then come down to what the mobo vendor thinks the limits of said mobo are to get the best out of a cpu.
I don't know of course if all mobo vendors have this option in a bios, i do know that Asus have it in the CH8. If all mobo vendors had the same option, then that would sort out good or bad VRM's very easily.
Tbh, you got some points but his video on this matter has improved as he used to just test the boards with 3950x stock and overclocked. Now he has 3700x, 3900x and 3950x covering quite a few use scenarios. He also summarise them and caveat it.
really it is readers beware sort of situation.
I think it’s a fair game tbh. Ppl buying cheapy B550 boards probably won’t be thinking about coupling it with 3950x now but it could be a factor down the line. And if the price differential is £30 between something that can handle a 3950x overclocked and one that can’t then that’s a fairly valid point to make.
although rubbishing cheapy board outright is probably a bit extreme. Saying that some of the MSI x570 boards are truly terrible. Not entirely sure what they were meant for as it can barely handle any thing above 3700x.
Which are the best *basic* B550/x570 boards today, with excellent VRMs?
I expect to run a 3950x or 4950x on my £90 tomahawk max
I was disappointed when I found out my X570 Carbon has some of the worst VRM cooling of all the X570 boards. However, it had no problems with my 3800X folding @ home. The VRM's stayed below 65 degrees. The board is also pretty good with overclocking RAM.
Had I intended to overclock the crap out of a 3950 in a case with poor airflow, I would be a lot more dissapointed. But it handles my 3800X easy.
Still sucks to spend money on something I thought would be overkill, only to find out it was merely "sufficient" for my useage.
Had I intended to overclock the crap out of a 3950 in a case with poor airflow, I would be a lot more dissapointed. But it handles my 3800X easy.
Still sucks to spend money on something I thought would be overkill, only to find out it was merely "sufficient" for my useage.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 28 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 0
It’s absolutely a relevant data point. How YOU value that data point is up to you.
There’s been manufacturers repeatedly called out for poor vrm performance and in the very next generation what did they do? Massively beef up their vrm implementations. It’s a good thing we got guys like buildzoid doing pcb breakdowns and HUB focusing on vrm performance.
The difference between a good and bad vrm also means how much load voltage you need to stable. This is relevant also as boost is a factor of voltage, power and heat.
There’s been manufacturers repeatedly called out for poor vrm performance and in the very next generation what did they do? Massively beef up their vrm implementations. It’s a good thing we got guys like buildzoid doing pcb breakdowns and HUB focusing on vrm performance.
The difference between a good and bad vrm also means how much load voltage you need to stable. This is relevant also as boost is a factor of voltage, power and heat.
Associate
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2016
- Posts
- 543
I think what is annoying is the widespread belief that thermals prove a VRM is good or not, which is only partly correct.
VRMs cannot be tested purely by thermal "analysis". Realistically a hot VRM reduces the lifespan of the FETs and bulk caps, and will heat-soak the motherboard eventually, but otherwise means little in terms of performance.
Look at it this way, a great engineer will optimise the design perfectly for cost-benefit. This overly sensitive focus on VRM temperatures only serves to increase the cost of the motherboards, where FETs, inductors and low ESR bulk caps cost £££.
My opinion for 99% of users: Choose a mobo with the features you want. Check the board temps around VRMs stay below ~80C on your processor & workloads. Be happy.
EDIT: HWUB pretty much follows with the 80C @ processor & workload criteria, so I'm not knocking them, more the community focus on VRM thermals.
Last edited:
For me, it is the price of the B550 they are creeping up in price a lot so it does become a option to put in a 3950 as most are £150 to £200+ and they not low end motherboards because of price, so in my eyes they should be able to handle a 3950 even overclocked.
Added not the cheap B550 boards
The problem is they are removing the more budget end, its all well and good to say "oh but it can run a 3950X overclocked" so i ask can i have a B550 board that doesn't overclock a 3950X for <£100? No sorry, but you can have this one for £150, it has great VRMs....
I'm sick to death of this community being so easily duped by useless shiny stuff cheering on prices getting ramped up, this is how we ended up with £700 mid range graphics cards, the new minimum price for unlocked motherboards is £120, up from £70, hurray.... they have nice VRMs for 3950X overclocking.
I give up... i'll get a console at this rate.