Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
You seem to be just plain making things up, rather than paraphrasing. According to your signature you own the ASRock AB350 Pro4, which you claim he said is "junk" and to avoid. I can't find any evidence of him doing so. In fact, he named the ASRock AB350M his best budget buy for B350 in this video and said it "can't be beat" for the price, calling it a "great motherboard" and recommending the Pro4 if you want to spend a bit more (he even mentions the great display out options as a positive):Way back when Steve reviewed the Motherboard that i now own, he dropped an 1800X in it, overclocked the proverbials off it and concluded "its crap, don't buy it the VRMs are junk" i'm paraphrasing...
You seem to be just plain making things up, rather than paraphrasing. According to your signature you own the ASRock AB350 Pro4, which you claim he said is "junk" and to avoid. I can't find any evidence of him doing so. In fact, he named the ASRock AB350M his best budget buy for B350 in this video and said it "can't be beat" for the price, calling it a "great motherboard" and recommending the Pro4 if you want to spend a bit more (he even mentions the great display out options as a positive):
He also created another video last year where he tested Zen 2 chips on the Pro4, again praising it and delivering the conclusion that it was still absolutely fine for anything up to a stock 3900X, whilst noting that you probably shouldn't overclock a 3900X on it.
So he actually said the complete opposite of what you're claiming. You're holding a grudge about something that exists only within your own mind.
![]()
It’s absolutely a relevant data point. How YOU value that data point is up to you.
There’s been manufacturers repeatedly called out for poor vrm performance and in the very next generation what did they do? Massively beef up their vrm implementations. It’s a good thing we got guys like buildzoid doing pcb breakdowns and HUB focusing on vrm performance.
The difference between a good and bad vrm also means how much load voltage you need to stable. This is relevant also as boost is a factor of voltage, power and heat.
Lol, Bug you’ve had a mare here mate.Yes fair enough, i can't remember where that came from then. So apologies to Steve for that one.
If anything it proves you don't need huge expensive VRMs even if you're overclocking a 3950X
PS: it does 3333Mhz on the DDR4 with MY 3600 just fine, it will not do more tho...
It is yes, but I don't think that's the point being made. I think the point is more how super critical Steve is with the less expensive boards and how if you buy one of those boards, they're very likely nowhere near as poor as he makes out and do a perfect job in all but the most extreme use case scenarios. Fairly sure that's being said here.
A 1hr blender test is not an extreme scenario. Let’s not start calling rendering an extreme use case.
Er, I don't believe I've said that?