McLaren 570S

Actually that was exactly my point. The type of person who drops the thick end of £200k on a supercar will get their car serviced by a main dealer and not give a hoot about saving a few hundred quid by going to an independent, let alone doing it themselves! Quite apart from not caring about the money, in this market it pays to maintain a relationship with the dealer, not cut them out to try to save a few quid.

Not just that. Look at resale. If two Identical cars come up. 1 serviced by Mclaren and one by an Indy. Which one will be worth more/ More saleable
 
Not a chance. Our MP4-12c had over $100k in warranty work done in 18 months of ownership. Exotics need a sizeable reserve fund to be safely run to that mileage. You can get lucky, some of mine have required very little over the years, but on all of them, I’m always prepared for that $50k bill around the corner.

that's very different than some other McLaren owners comments. At another forum called cars.mclaren.com, they said McLaren is the Honda of sports car. Except that GPS, nothing goes wrong

However, the MP4-12C is a buggy car, so they were talking about the 650, they do agree that the Mp4-12C has problems
 
If it were my money I'd always go with the dealer serviced vehicle.

Granted GTRs arent in the same price bracket as McLarens, but a service book filled with Litchfeild/AT/Kaizer service stamps will hold a lot more weight than a book filled with Nissan High Performance Center stamps.

Same as DP/UGR/Hefner/Nth Moto etc for Lambos

Paul Matias for Lotuses

SSC for most things over 100k

Dealer stamps are for people with OCD and million quid hypercars.
 
that's very different than some other McLaren owners comments. At another forum called cars.mclaren.com, they said McLaren is the Honda of sports car. Except that GPS, nothing goes wrong

However, the MP4-12C is a buggy car, so they were talking about the 650, they do agree that the Mp4-12C has problems

Too early to say with the 540/570.

One of the core issue was the dealers were simply not set up to support the cars in the early days and the 12C was riddled with issues that impacted those first in. They also **** cash come resale and that put a lot of people off the brand completely. I know people who will never buy another no matter how good they may be. I think they are now in a much better place and the 12C has been worked to a point where reliability is better but all of them need more miles before anyone can claim they are like Honda's.
 
Agreed, but I think the bubble is about to burst in them. McLaren's, aside form what the dealers tell people are not something the market knows how to value properly at the moment. At 110K the 12C and 140K for a 570S you have a better buy, but I still think they could be £90K and £120K in 12 months. I know how much I was offered a nearly new car for and how much therefore it had lost on list. I am not a truly wealthy chap, I do OK, I have good years, really good but I can't dump 175K on a car without a thought. Big money for me, need to ensure I don't risk anything which is why I will put a big deposit in and only one I am wiling to accept I might/probably won't get back.

I was looking at the Ferrari 458 spider a Du Pont Registry (current mth.) vs. the Ferrari 488 Spider. with the tiny difference of the 2 cars, an used 458 spider w/ a little bit of mileage is US$80K LESS than the 488 spider. A Civic Si Coupe 2010, the price is $13K, but a new 2017 Si coupe is $31K, same HP, slightly different at the front / back, but in reality, it's the same car with small improvement.

also check this out:

http://www.mclarenlife.com/forums/mclaren-570s/32937-worth-buying-570s-new.html

I thought w/ such a big price difference, if I have $ for a 570 spider, I would buy an used one providing the maintenance cost per year is less than $2K to $4K

by the way, don't click this video of this UK dealer unless you want to buy a 570S :p

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPpQNhIkz9c
 
Last edited:
I want to retract the prior comment that someone at McLarenLife.com told me the "McLaren is the Honda of sports car". He's obviously lying.

The 570 is a newer ver. of 650, but essentially the same car, different engine. So looking at the history of 650, at that forum, there are a no. of serious issues:

1) engine on fire:
http://www.mclarenlife.com/forums/mclaren-650s/73553-mclaren-650s-fire-new-jersey.html

2) coolant leak

http://www.mclarenlife.com/forums/mclaren-650s/41426-650s-leaking-blue-fluid.html

3) poor service, a lack of parts for months, while the owner have to continue to pay insurance

http://www.mclarenlife.com/forums/mclaren-650s/75129-mclaren-service-sucks.html

==============================

So there are problems. (I only view thru the first 8 pages) A good question that I have is:

this car is $100K LESS than Ferrari 488 spider, is there something wrong w/ this car to make it $100K cheaper? comparing similar car of other brand name

I always wonder why there is so many problems with these exotic cars, even though you pay $200K more than an average car.

For e.g., a Honda Civic SI Coupe can do 200 HP, you talk to every honda owner, there is no need to do any repair, it can still accelerate quite fast, and you never have to worry the engine will catch fire.

Now if we pay $200K+ more, we end up more trouble than a $30K car can do, what gives?
 
Now if we pay $200K+ more, we end up more trouble than a $30K car can do, what gives?

The 30k cars are all built on the same software, the same components that are over-engineered and are under-tuned. They are built with 10x more reliability and safety margin than is ever needed.
 
I want to retract the prior comment that someone at McLarenLife.com told me the "McLaren is the Honda of sports car". He's obviously lying.

The 570 is a newer ver. of 650, but essentially the same car, different engine. So looking at the history of 650, at that forum, there are a no. of serious issues:

No it's not. The 570 is from the Sport Series where the 650 is from their Super Series, the class above. The 720s is the replacement to the 650s. The latter had serious issues for sure given that it was heavily based on their original MP4-12C, their first car. But the 570 came much later so it's not fair to base its reliability of the 650s.

Also, your comparison to the 488 is also unfair, that's the 720s's competitor.
 
this car is $100K LESS than Ferrari 488 spider, is there something wrong w/ this car to make it $100K cheaper? comparing similar car of other brand name

I always wonder why there is so many problems with these exotic cars, even though you pay $200K more than an average car.

For e.g., a Honda Civic SI Coupe can do 200 HP, you talk to every honda owner, there is no need to do any repair, it can still accelerate quite fast, and you never have to worry the engine will catch fire.

Now if we pay $200K+ more, we end up more trouble than a $30K car can do, what gives?

Just compare the number of cars that Honda make and the number of years that they have been making them compared to McLaren. They have a huge database of information on how to make cars and manufacturing processes and how to improve things from generation to generation. They will also cover many hundreds of thousands of miles during testing that a small company that only makes a couple of thousand cars a year can't get close to.

As to the big OEMs not having issues just look at the recalls that happen when things go wrong after the cars have been released to the public.
 
Ferrari prices are out on their own in terms of residuals atm - 458s are holding their value ridiculously well, because they are the last of the N/A Ferrari mid-engined sports cars, but even bog standard 488s are still selling for a premium over factory prices. Ferrari do well do manage production and demand. McLarens are pretty well known for haemorrhaging value - talking £80-90k over 2 years for the early 12C and 650S owners. :eek:

Either way I think there are some deals to be had at the moment. Lots of McLaren people trading up to the 720S, so selling their 12C/650S/570S in anticipation, but also at the same time there are lots of people getting out of their supercar as the uncertainty of brexit approaches, which means there are a lot of cars available and at lower prices than you might think.
 
I want to retract the prior comment that someone at McLarenLife.com told me the "McLaren is the Honda of sports car". He's obviously lying.

The 570 is a newer ver. of 650, but essentially the same car, different engine. So looking at the history of 650, at that forum, there are a no. of serious issues:

1) engine on fire:
http://www.mclarenlife.com/forums/mclaren-650s/73553-mclaren-650s-fire-new-jersey.html

2) coolant leak

http://www.mclarenlife.com/forums/mclaren-650s/41426-650s-leaking-blue-fluid.html

3) poor service, a lack of parts for months, while the owner have to continue to pay insurance

http://www.mclarenlife.com/forums/mclaren-650s/75129-mclaren-service-sucks.html

==============================

So there are problems. (I only view thru the first 8 pages) A good question that I have is:

this car is $100K LESS than Ferrari 488 spider, is there something wrong w/ this car to make it $100K cheaper? comparing similar car of other brand name

I always wonder why there is so many problems with these exotic cars, even though you pay $200K more than an average car.

For e.g., a Honda Civic SI Coupe can do 200 HP, you talk to every honda owner, there is no need to do any repair, it can still accelerate quite fast, and you never have to worry the engine will catch fire.

Now if we pay $200K+ more, we end up more trouble than a $30K car can do, what gives?

Im struggling to follow you somewhat, might be my fault but not sure what the Honda thing, outside of a comment some person you don't know made and some Top Trumps comparisons.

Are you in the market to buy one or are you simply pulling facts from various sources to form an opinion? Nothing wrong with that, but as I know quite a few owners of McLarens, from 12c's right up to P1 GTR's I form my opinion based on chatting with them, many of who post on Maclife.

The fact you talk dollars I guess means you are not in the UK, so again the service experience might be different where you are, so not really apples for apples.
 
Ferrari prices are out on their own in terms of residuals atm - 458s are holding their value ridiculously well, because they are the last of the N/A Ferrari mid-engined sports cars, but even bog standard 488s are still selling for a premium over factory prices. Ferrari do well do manage production and demand. McLarens are pretty well known for haemorrhaging value - talking £80-90k over 2 years for the early 12C and 650S owners. :eek:

Either way I think there are some deals to be had at the moment. Lots of McLaren people trading up to the 720S, so selling their 12C/650S/570S in anticipation, but also at the same time there are lots of people getting out of their supercar as the uncertainty of brexit approaches, which means there are a lot of cars available and at lower prices than you might think.

It think we will see 570S's trading in the 110's before the end of the year.
 
Back
Top Bottom