I want to retract the prior comment that someone at McLarenLife.com told me the "McLaren is the Honda of sports car". He's obviously lying.
The 570 is a newer ver. of 650, but essentially the same car, different engine. So looking at the history of 650, at that forum, there are a no. of serious issues:
1) engine on fire:
http://www.mclarenlife.com/forums/mclaren-650s/73553-mclaren-650s-fire-new-jersey.html
2) coolant leak
http://www.mclarenlife.com/forums/mclaren-650s/41426-650s-leaking-blue-fluid.html
3) poor service, a lack of parts for months, while the owner have to continue to pay insurance
http://www.mclarenlife.com/forums/mclaren-650s/75129-mclaren-service-sucks.html
==============================
So there are problems. (I only view thru the first 8 pages) A good question that I have is:
this car is $100K LESS than Ferrari 488 spider, is there something wrong w/ this car to make it $100K cheaper? comparing similar car of other brand name
I always wonder why there is so many problems with these exotic cars, even though you pay $200K more than an average car.
For e.g., a Honda Civic SI Coupe can do 200 HP, you talk to every honda owner, there is no need to do any repair, it can still accelerate quite fast, and you never have to worry the engine will catch fire.
Now if we pay $200K+ more, we end up more trouble than a $30K car can do, what gives?