Just something I thought of today after the race, thought it could be discussion worthy, though no doubt its gonna be full of IFs and BUTs. I guess with speculation comes heated debate so lets keep it civil
I do think in hindsight that if McLaren had kept Alonso over Hamilton they as a team would have enjoyed more success by now and most likely achieve the WCC thats eluded them for many years aswell as more WDCs for Alonso. For sake of argument lets assume they still picked the same second drivers so during the Kova years I doubt it would have been much different though that leads me to my second thought.
I also think during this period McLaren would have built better cars from the outset purely on the basis that Alonso is the better technical driver over Hamilton and much more able to inform engineers how to setup the car and where to investigate upgrades which would have lead to a virtous circle in success and performance, especially in todays world of limited testing...
This has kinda ended up as a statement rather than the simple question I posed in the title, but whats your thoughts? Seriously if you feel this topic has been done to death, say and Ill get this thread deleted, I personally think this angle regards McLarens fortunes hasnt really and Im considering not who is the faster driver but who would have benefited McLaren more or worked better within driver pairings.
NB: For sake of argument lets pretend that LH entered the sport with another team so LH and FA never raced at McLaren together...
P.S. Im happy to attempt to backup my claims where possible, but thought most were either generally agreed or just plain obvious
ps3ud0
I do think in hindsight that if McLaren had kept Alonso over Hamilton they as a team would have enjoyed more success by now and most likely achieve the WCC thats eluded them for many years aswell as more WDCs for Alonso. For sake of argument lets assume they still picked the same second drivers so during the Kova years I doubt it would have been much different though that leads me to my second thought.
I also think during this period McLaren would have built better cars from the outset purely on the basis that Alonso is the better technical driver over Hamilton and much more able to inform engineers how to setup the car and where to investigate upgrades which would have lead to a virtous circle in success and performance, especially in todays world of limited testing...
This has kinda ended up as a statement rather than the simple question I posed in the title, but whats your thoughts? Seriously if you feel this topic has been done to death, say and Ill get this thread deleted, I personally think this angle regards McLarens fortunes hasnt really and Im considering not who is the faster driver but who would have benefited McLaren more or worked better within driver pairings.
NB: For sake of argument lets pretend that LH entered the sport with another team so LH and FA never raced at McLaren together...
P.S. Im happy to attempt to backup my claims where possible, but thought most were either generally agreed or just plain obvious
ps3ud0
Last edited: