MEG power. Infinite power in your home?

[DefiantAsh]

They should have this in power stations, instead of all this nuclear rubbish.

But then to make the magnets, you need the use of fossil fuels so its still using fuels which will eventually run out, so not really a "world saver"

lol op...

 

[Le_Petit_Lapin]

The MEG has never been independently verified and there is no known working prototype.

Yeah. I lost interest around about there.

 

[PhillyDee]

I'm not hiding behind anything.

It is my belief that as a human race, we must question the status quo. This is the only way that we shall make strides forward.

By all means, look at previous/older theories. This is important. But to simply take each of these older theories as 100% correct, with no room for manoeuvre (for special cases/circumstances which have not yet been discovered), is not the right way to go about things.

That's my opinion...take it or leave it.

Its not a theory. Its not the theory of quantum physics, or the theory of mavity. Its a LAW. Do you not think a scientist would LOVE to be able to refute this. The point of science is to move the boundaries. Every experiment is designed to overturn or prove existing theories.

Like you say, its your opinion.
Even if its wrong.

 

[Spit]

OP has not replied, I fear he has given all his money to this Australian!

 

[Liampope]

I'm not hiding behind anything.

It is my belief that as a human race, we must question the status quo. This is the only way that we shall make strides forward.

By all means, look at previous/older theories. This is important. But to simply take each of these older theories as 100% correct, with no room for manoeuvre (for special cases/circumstances which have not yet been discovered), is not the right way to go about things.

That's my opinion...take it or leave it.

Yes we get it. Scientists get it. Always have. Nobody actually does think our current models are the complete and immutable truth. That would make science a religion, which it isn't. Claims to the contrary are usually the butthurt ranting of scammers and pseudoscientists. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, so a simple device which claims to disobey established physical laws (theories dont get to be called laws unless they stand up to literally centuries of scrutiny unscathed) needs some pretty extraordinary evidence. This pile of crap has none at all. Rejecting outright stuff like this is no more closed minded than rejecting outright someone who says "Hi, I'm the son of God", "Really? Prove it", "Um... no. Just believe me, please. I mean I could be the son of God, right?"

 

[MikeHunt79]

Transformers and magnets, how do they work?

 

[Angilion]

Yes we get it. Scientists get it. Always have. Nobody actually does think our current models are the complete and immutable truth. That would make science a religion, which it isn't. Claims to the contrary are usually the butthurt ranting of scammers and pseudoscientists. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, so a simple device which claims to disobey established physical laws (theories dont get to be called laws unless they stand up to literally centuries of scrutiny unscathed) needs some pretty extraordinary evidence. This pile of crap has none at all. Rejecting outright stuff like this is no more closed minded than rejecting outright someone who says "Hi, I'm the son of God", "Really? Prove it", "Um... no. Just believe me, please. I mean I could be the son of God, right?"

For the sake of clarity:

Theories don't get to be called laws under any circumstances. They're two different things.

A theory is an explanation of how some aspect of the universe works, generally broad in scope (e.g. explaining the changing of living things over generations).

A law is a description of a relationship between things, or what happens to something under specific circumstances (e.g. Ohm's law describes the relationship between resistance, current and potential difference in electrical circuits). It explains nothing and generally has a narrow scope.