Metal gear solid 'Lambda'
- Thread starter mattyfez
- Start date
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,142
Performance looks shocking in the videos I've seen
Although I'm really interested in playing the game, from what I understand it takes about 12 hours to complete much of which comprises of cutscenes. Apparently there is an achievement for completing the game in under 5 hours. That's not worth £50 of my money, I expect it will drop in price significantly once the hype dies down.
So the same as any UE5 game then? Big deal. We are used to using DLSS/FSR/Frame Generation with UE5 games.
It's capped at 60FPS anyway.
Clearly haven't played the original MGS3 then? It's one of the best in the series.
Last edited:
Nope i havent and doubt id want to from what i saw.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,142
Last edited:
That is pretty bad.
Silent Hill 2 had some stuttering too, not as bad as that mind! Both UE5, I'm sure some patches will level that out a fair bit though. It'll never be perfect, being UE5.
2/3 are regarded as the best in the series, so that's a strange mindset to have, for someone who hasn't played it themselves, each to their own.
Last edited:
Some Devs are more talented than others, just like in any walk of life.
True
my comment was merely relating to FPS versus the engine - ala it's just how it is now, the same can be said for non UE5 engine games, such as Alan Wake 2, that required manditory DLSS/DLAA. If it looks good visually, I don't even have a second thought regarding upscaling.Stutter wise, the majority of UE5 engine games seem to do this, and I disbelieve that it can be fixed - I'd rather we go back to dev's using their own engine, like AW2, TLOU, RE, GTA, and COD, does.