Midweek Football Thread

Loki · 3 Nov 2009 at 20:52

cheets64 said:
Got his leg but a bit of swan dive

So still a penalty then.

Glad we agree on that

4p · 3 Nov 2009 at 20:54

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

LMAO

Shamikebab · 3 Nov 2009 at 20:55

That was a high tackle.

syke · 3 Nov 2009 at 20:55

Thorpy said:
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

LMAO

4p · 3 Nov 2009 at 20:55

The ref LOL

G|mp · 3 Nov 2009 at 20:56

syke said:
Stonewall either way.

Loki said:
So still a penalty then.

Glad we agree on that

It's cheets.

He could have shot him in the face and he would still find some reason for MU to be in the wrong.

Burned_Alive · 3 Nov 2009 at 20:57

G|mp said:
He could have shot him in the face and he would still find some reason for MU to be in the wrong.

Shouldn't have been standing there tbh.

G|mp · 3 Nov 2009 at 20:57

The Roon.

Shamikebab · 3 Nov 2009 at 20:57

Thorpy said:
The ref LOL

yeah we got it, got anything else to say? :confused:

G|mp · 3 Nov 2009 at 20:57

Burned_Alive said:
Shouldn't have been standing there tbh.

He dived, it was only a flesh wound.

4p · 3 Nov 2009 at 20:58

Shamikebab said:
yeah we got it, got anything else to say?

Sure, refs an idiot.

syke · 3 Nov 2009 at 20:59

Would've taken off one of the central players for Rooney.

Shamikebab · 3 Nov 2009 at 20:59

nice tackle Scholes, I'd like to see Anderson come on in midfield.

wth why is Nani coming off :confused:

he's been far better than Valencia tonight.

he just ran straight into the defender, yet of course people aren't begging for him to be sold are they.

syke · 3 Nov 2009 at 21:00

Shamikebab said:
nice tackle Scholes, I'd like to see Anderson come on in midfield.

wth why is Nani coming off he's been far better than Valencia tonight.

Both been a bit wasteful, but not bad, still would've taken Scholes off, most likely. Play a more 4-3-3.

Loki · 3 Nov 2009 at 21:00

G|mp said:
It's cheets.

He could have shot him in the face and he would still find some reason for MU to be in the wrong.

Just boils my **** mate. You get all sorts of snidey comments like that, 'he went down easy there' or 'took a bit of a dive'. Doesn't matter how he went down. Defender played the ball not the man and it was a penalty.

Personally I don't think he exagerated the foul either.

andi · 3 Nov 2009 at 21:00

G|mp said:
It's cheets.

He could have shot him in the face and he would still find some reason for MU to be in the wrong.

CSKA freekick for bleeding on the opposition.

syke · 3 Nov 2009 at 21:01

Loki said:
Just boils my **** mate. You get all sorts of snidey comments like that, 'he went down easy there' or 'took a bit of a dive'. Doesn't matter how he went down. Defender played the ball not the man and it was a penalty.

Personally I don't think he exagerated the foul either.

Flicked his legs back, but still an absolute stonewall penalty. Baffling.

Shamikebab · 3 Nov 2009 at 21:02

this is ****ing me off, once again we're just hoofing it up to our three 6ft plus attackers, oh wait. If scholes and Fletcher can't support the attack then take Scholes off and bring on Anderson :confused:

G|mp · 3 Nov 2009 at 21:02

I find it best just to ignore him nowadays, he has been outed on other forums for being slightly thick so I've realised he can't help it.

cheets64 · 3 Nov 2009 at 21:05

Loki said:
So still a penalty then.

Glad we agree on that

G|mp said:
It's cheets.

He could have shot him in the face and he would still find some reason for MU to be in the wrong.

Loki said:
Just boils my **** mate. You get all sorts of snidey comments like that, 'he went down easy there' or 'took a bit of a dive'. Doesn't matter how he went down. Defender played the ball not the man and it was a penalty.

Personally I don't think he exagerated the foul either.

How was it a snidey comment, he could have stayed of his feet from the replay and had a shot.