And that is where sensible goverment policy comes into play as they have far more potential options than the central bank do. It shouldnt only be the central banks job to curb inflation when the only tool theyve been given is a mallet.wasnt it the governor who said raising interest rates to curb inflation is the bluntest tool they have but also the only tool they have
At some point you just have to accept life isn't fair. And that many people get shafted through no fault of thier own.
I have no idea how this inflation will go down. I don't really fully understand how it's gotten so high.
There are the obvious things
-brexit
-Ukraine war
-post covid demand
But Ir would be interesting to know more of the key drivers.
And how to actually tackle it beyond crippling individuals spending power.
Exactly my Grandad had to deal with WW1, WW2, rationing in the 50's and strikes of the 70's so we haven't had it as bad as people make out. It is just the boomer generation have got it absolutely perfect that it makes our lives look less. Brexit, Ukraine, Covid are all but accelerators. We have been on this course ever since the 80's it has just happened sooner. The whole Ponzi scheme of Western Capitalism has run its course. Far too much of the minority have far too much of the money. Until that is fixed nothing will change.
If energy and utilities hadn't been privatised 40 years ago we would have been in a completely different situation to what we have now. We were world leaders in civilian nuclear energy, we have by far the most amount of oil in Western Europe but we sold it all to get rich quick. We would have been totally unaffected now as we would have mostly self sufficient energy and a sovereign wealth fund that makes Norway look like a pauper.
Exactly my Grandad had to deal with WW1, WW2, rationing in the 50's and strikes of the 70's so we haven't had it as bad as people make out. It is just the boomer generation have got it absolutely perfect that it makes our lives look less. Brexit, Ukraine, Covid are all but accelerators. We have been on this course ever since the 80's it has just happened sooner. The whole Ponzi scheme of Western Capitalism has run its course. Far too much of the minority have far too much of the money. Until that is fixed nothing will change.
If energy and utilities hadn't been privatised 40 years ago we would have been in a completely different situation to what we have now. We were world leaders in civilian nuclear energy, we have by far the most amount of oil in Western Europe but we sold it all to get rich quick. We would have been totally unaffected now as we would have mostly self sufficient energy and a sovereign wealth fund that makes Norway look like a pauper.
Just because its worked in the past doesnt mean its a good solution in the current scenario.
We can tell how little people were spending last year on luxuries by the fact we had to have energy price support to stop people dying over winter because they cant afford their energy bills,
Sadly the poorer end of society is the majority of society. And then as weve seen the richer end simply benefit from this "solution".To be fair thats slightly different, dan was saying it doesnt work, so why were people doing the same flawed solution again, when it has worked before, which is why they are doing it.
You are only focussing on the poorer end of society though. As a whole, the country has been awash with spare money, as a huge amount was saved through covid when people couldn't spend it. So the demand for goods and services has still been very high, even though the supply side shortage was increasing costs massively.
No it shouldn't only be BoE. But if you are given a hammer and know it will destroy what you're trying to fix, surely you as a competent individual would push back and say "hang on, no Im not going to use this hammer because it will do more harm than good, take it back and either give me better tools or fix it yourself"?And that is where sensible goverment policy comes into play as they have far more potential options than the central bank do. It shouldnt only be the central banks job to curb inflation when the only tool theyve been given is a mallet.
We're on the same page then.No it shouldn't only be BoE. But if you are given a hammer and know it will destroy what you're trying to fix, surely you as a competent individual would push back and say "hang on, no Im not going to use this hammer because it will do more harm than good, take it back and either give me better tools or fix it yourself"?
Only an idiot continues to use the hammer.
Absolutely, I was just reinforcing the point that BoE shouldn't continue to use tools when they themselves know how 'blunt' they are. Only an idiot would do that. If they had any competence they would be pushing back on the Government.We're on the same page then.
Lol.
Way to go about proving you have no ******* clue.
We are just not on the same page. You seem to believe BoE should just continue to raise rates even if it destroys the economy and individual livelihoods in the process. I don't.
Didn't you fix your mortgage for a decent term?
Once upon a time there was a chancellor who believed in prudence. Get rid of all this annoying boom and bust was his mantra, believe in prudence. His first act once his government had been elected was to remove the right of government to meddle with interest rates. It is prudent to do so he said. Let the Bank of England decide what the rates should be and when to change them. We only require that they should have a target of 2% for inflation and if they do not meet it they should jolly well write me a letter to explain themselves.
Have I got this upside down here, but doesn’t raising interest rates punish the normal people and reward the rich? Normal people who need to borrow for a house, car etc, and reward people who have excess cash they can invest? Literally taking from normal people who need to borrow and giving to people who can invest?
If inflation is measured against standard items food / energy etc? Then raising interest rates won’t help to cull demand… as people still need to buy those items?
Is there not a temporary tax they could impose against luxury goods instead? Then the rich can invest their money instead of buying Gucci belts?
I'm not sure you fully understand inflation or how the approach of raising interest rates tackles it. Raising rates is in effect a temporary tax. Targeting a tax towards only the wealthy minority isn't going to effectively make a difference.
It's unfortunate that both inflation and interest rates hurt the poorest in society the most.