I meant, whether it was renters or homeowners who had problems obviously. We've seen this before, you know back in the old times but for you this is all new. Unfortunately you will probably see more as time goes on because of the fixed rate mortgage terms coming to an end and the owners face a sudden huge increase.Neither, otherwise they wouldn't be presenting as homeless, would they.
It's going to be for all sorts of reasons, rents becoming unaffordable or arrears during Covid and being evicted, extended family breakdowns, I'm sure we will see more and more bank evictions from mortgaged properties, that hasn't really kicked off yet.
The point is it wasn't even a category 5 years ago that anyone thought about.
I expect it would be more in St Albans right?
We have a 3 (2.5 really) bed detached. It's not big at all. But it is properly detached with (for a newish build) a lot of garden.
Its 320-340ish on right move/zoopla.
In St Albans.. Not sure what an equivalent would cost!
Well.. Ours is better than this
Ha no. And I had to Google that term!I thought you doxxed yourself for a moment right there @413x
Did we know what it would be like in 30 or 40 years when we started to work?I do wonder what that's going to look like.
Imagine the welfare bill.
I guess there will be very little. I mean if it's creaking now who knows what it will be like in 30 years.
When have we seen this before ? Maybe the end of the slum lord period of the late 19th, early 20th century, but you're right I'm not 150 so no I wasn't around.I meant, whether it was renters or homeowners who had problems obviously. We've seen this before, you know back in the old times but for you this is all new. Unfortunately you will probably see more as time goes on because of the fixed rate mortgage terms coming to an end and the owners face a sudden huge increase.
Did we know what it would be like in 30 or 40 years when we started to work?
The point is that they are being bought even though the statistics say we have this huge gulf between the wages and house prices.Yeh, there are some mega silly prices in the commuter belt/close suburbs of London.
My old family house in Surrey which is a pretty old, average sized 3 bed semi with an average garden and one space on the drive with garage is now worth nearly £800k...! Whole road of similar houses are going for that.
Similarly they built brand new 4 bed terrace houses behind where I used to work. TERRACE, 4 bed but not that big. Backed on to an industrial estate and train track, no garage or drive (had a communal parking area) and tiny garden with a big corrugated warehouse roof at the back (lovely view
..) and they sold them all for £750 - 800k.
I just don't understand who is buying them or how anyone can afford them.
If ever there is a crash due, it's due in those areas. It doesn't even make sense to pay so much to be close to London now with modern technology and remote working etc.
The point is that they are being bought even though the statistics say we have this huge gulf between the wages and house prices.
I just don't understand who is buying them or how anyone can afford them.
People on six figure salaries and probably a couple. People who are mortgaged up to their eyeballs or who have wealthy families who can help them with deposits. A large number of these expensive houses will also simply be owned by people who bought decades earlier at much cheaper prices or people who bought decades ago and have ridden their way up the ladder with increasing house prices.
Thats essentially what we will do. Our next house will be our forever home and we will have gone from a flat to a 3 bedroom house and then to probably a 4-5 bedroom house. Over the (probably 10 years) we will have been in the housing market we will have gained about £150-200,000 simply from property increases and then we will have aggressively paid down our mortgages. Even then with two of us earning decent ish salaries our next house will saddle us with probably £400-500,000 on the mortgage on a £900k-1m house.
1990's recession when 75,000 homes were repossed in 91 declining til around 2004When have we seen this before ? Maybe the end of the slum lord period of the late 19th, early 20th century, but you're right I'm not 150 so no I wasn't around.
Yes that is the problem now and it was back when we bought our first house. People with more money offering more than the houses were valued at or couples taking out the maximum that they could go for without a small safety net.They are being bought due to the growing rich poor divide.
And rents were reasonable, and there was at least still some public housing. You're right in the fact you can probably trace that to being the beginning of the downward spiral that is the UK housing mess, but it simply wasn't just as bad.1990's recession when 75,000 homes were repossed in 91 declining til around 2004
Population is increasing in england and in the SE in particular the majority due to immigrationNo. But if things carry on as they are.. Its not looking pretty.
Things I don't see reversing
-population decline
Yep remember that my sister newly married bought a tiny one bed and had to give it up because they couldn't afford the mortgage increases negative equity became a thing at that time properties worth less than people were paying for them was sold for less than they paid for it iirc took an age to tend that around pretty sure it contributed to the divorce1990's recession when 75,000 homes were repossed in 91 declining til around 2004
Ask yourself why do you want to saddle yourself with so much debt?People on six figure salaries and probably a couple. People who are mortgaged up to their eyeballs or who have wealthy families who can help them with deposits. A large number of these expensive houses will also simply be owned by people who bought decades earlier at much cheaper prices or people who bought decades ago and have ridden their way up the ladder with increasing house prices.
Thats essentially what we will do. Our next house will be our forever home and we will have gone from a flat to a 3 bedroom house and then to probably a 4-5 bedroom house. Over the (probably 10 years) we will have been in the housing market we will have gained about £150-200,000 simply from property increases and then we will have aggressively paid down our mortgages. Even then with two of us earning decent ish salaries our next house will saddle us with probably £400-500,000 on the mortgage on a £900k-1m house.
People on six figure salaries and probably a couple. People who are mortgaged up to their eyeballs or who have wealthy families who can help them with deposits. A large number of these expensive houses will also simply be owned by people who bought decades earlier at much cheaper prices or people who bought decades ago and have ridden their way up the ladder with increasing house prices.
Thats essentially what we will do. Our next house will be our forever home and we will have gone from a flat to a 3 bedroom house and then to probably a 4-5 bedroom house. Over the (probably 10 years) we will have been in the housing market we will have gained about £150-200,000 simply from property increases and then we will have aggressively paid down our mortgages. Even then with two of us earning decent ish salaries our next house will saddle us with probably £400-500,000 on the mortgage on a £900k-1m house.
I've had 2 houses from 1981 til now, in that time we have had almost everything thrown at us, unemployment, low wages, recession, high interest rates, gazumping, etc. I'm still paying my mortgage til I'm 67-68, so that is a 45ish term. If we sell we will make very little money from it as the property we would have to buy will also be at an inflated value. Not everyone is a winner in life.And rents were reasonable, and there was at least still some public housing. You're right in the fact you can probably trace that to being the beginning of the downward spiral that is the UK housing mess, but it simply wasn't just as bad.
That was because the increases were immediate not 5yrs down the line.Yep remember that my sister newly married bought a tiny one bed and had to give it up because they couldn't afford the mortgage increases negative equity became a thing at that time properties worth less than people were paying for them was sold for less than they paid for it iirc took an age to tend that around pretty sure it contributed to the divorce