True, but that election was about Brexit so the normal rules didn't apply. That said, I voted for them previously to get a lower tax bill, which probably was the biggest help for my cost of living so I don't regret that either. Different priorities for the next election though.
At least you have admitted to putting yourself first on an election vote, which deserves respect.
Does it? I just think it's the default thing to do, if everyone votes for what benefits them then whoever wins benefits the most people, which seems to me like the optimal outcome. I do understand there's a bunch of different approaches people take though, and some of them will think selfishness is bad.
Depends, the most vulnerable in the country are only a minority of people, and get shafted by that reasoning.
. I've seen some cars on reddit where the doors rusted through and you can see the driver. Not to mention how many people don't know their tyres are bald until told at the mot. I take good care of both our cars, but my wife's had 2 nroken springs one mot (I didn't take it in, and it was at kwikfit so I assume they were right), I suspect a manufacturing defect.
No it doesn't. Biennial means every other year, biannual means exactly what it says - twice a year.
Tyres should be assessed fortnightly when checking pressures and not left to the MOT tester. A competent owner or driver would check his or her tyres as a matter of course. Those of family members too. Windscreen wiper blades wear down as well.
Which will be the government stance, it up to the owner to ensure their car is roadworthy. We know though that plenty of people will happily ignore issues if it saves them money. This idea is ridiculous those that have proposed it are morons.
Well I have driven for 50 years and as far as I know it has always been the owners responsibility for the roadworthyness and safety of their vehicle. If not, the police should be removing them from the road and scrapping their vehicle.
![[TW]Fox](/data/man-of-honor/2009.png){kind=avatar}