• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

MSI 1080 ti - i5 2500k 4.5 ghz runs Amazing

Associate
Joined
17 Oct 2007
Posts
1,778
Location
Some where in England
Just got my MSI 1080ti running on my i5 2500k at 4.5 ghz and after playing all the latest games for the past hour on max settings at 1440p Resolution all I can say is WOW this card is a Beautiful! Every single game at 2.5k on ultra runs constantly over 60FPS , I know this card was going to be good but not this good. My games have never looked so good & run like butter. If anyone is thinking about buying a 1080ti do it you won't regret it.
 
Last edited:
Associate
OP
Joined
17 Oct 2007
Posts
1,778
Location
Some where in England
I know a lot of people must still have the i5 2500k and I can confirm that you 100% don't need to upgrade any time soon if you have it O/C ....

The only game that runs just under or around 60 FPS @ 1440 was Ghost recon Wild-lands on Very High settings , I've had a lot of decent cards over the years but this one just makes them all look amateur.

I am getting over 100 FPS on Ultra settings on Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege 2.5k 1400p

I'm going to make some videos tonight and ill post them on TY.
 
Soldato
Joined
2 Oct 2012
Posts
3,246
Yea 1080Ti is a cracking card. Iv'e got a 3770k at 3.7Ghz and only odd game has found the cpu to be a bottleneck. however i still get great performance. I know with a 7700k i would get much better minimums and averages but the price for that is quite significant atm.
 
Soldato
Joined
26 May 2009
Posts
22,101
2k is 1080p.
2K is 2048×1080, it's an older (now mostly obsolete) computer resolution that was a popular alternative to 1920x1200 back before TVs made 1920x1080 popular.


1440p is 2.5k.
No, 1440p is 1440p, the horizontal resolution depends on the aspect (I.E 3440x1440) hence ultrawide 1080p also being 2560 horizontal.

The idea of mislabeling 1080p as 2k and 1440p as 2.5k is PEBCAK that came in after 4K (3840x2160).
 
Soldato
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
7,913
Location
Stoke/Norfolk
Just got my MSI 1080ti running on my i5 2500k at 4.5 ghz and after playing all the latest games ............................. If anyone is thinking about buying a 1080ti do it you won't regret it ................... I know a lot of people must still have the i5 2500k and I can confirm that you 100% don't need to upgrade any time soon if you have it O/C

You're a bad BAD man! I've a 2600k @4.6ghz with a KFA2 780 HOF GPU and I'm also playing GR Wildlands at the moment. I wanted to upgrade the CPU and GPU to something more modern so I was tempted by a 7700k & 1070 setup (currently 1080p/60hz) but, after reading your post and a few others about the continued viability of the 2500k/2600k, I decided I'd use the 7700k money to just get a much better GPU instead and bought the KFA2 1080ti EX OC :D

Plus it helps when I swap to a 4k setup in a few years time too which is nice!
 
Associate
Joined
4 Mar 2016
Posts
62
No one needs to Upgrade there i5 2500k or 2600k ! Yet As I said the MSI 1080 Ti runs like a dream with these CPU's , Just been playing PREY tonight on Ultra at 2560x1440 and getting well over 100 FPS ! its Crazy and I love it.
Try watchdogs2 or fallout4.Prey runs good on everything even 10years old crap.
2500K is huge bottleneck in cpu demanding games.
 
Soldato
Joined
8 Mar 2010
Posts
4,967
Location
Aberdeenshire
2K is 2048×1080, it's an older (now mostly obsolete) computer resolution that was a popular alternative to 1920x1200 back before TVs made 1920x1080 popular.



No, 1440p is 1440p, the horizontal resolution depends on the aspect (I.E 3440x1440) hence ultrawide 1080p also being 2560 horizontal.

The idea of mislabeling 1080p as 2k and 1440p as 2.5k is PEBCAK that came in after 4K (3840x2160).
It's not really mislabelling it tbf but I don't like the naming scheme of 2k, 4k etc. For example 2.5k vs 4k does sound more impressive for 1440p than 3.6Mpixels vs 8.2Mpixels.

Nonetheless 1440p looks glorious compared to 1080p. Enjoy OP.
 

V F

V F

Soldato
Joined
13 Aug 2003
Posts
21,184
Location
UK
Try running Crysis on it at max settings. It still drops below 60fps at some points. Rare but it does it.
 
Associate
Joined
1 Nov 2013
Posts
713
Location
Ireland
Try watchdogs2 or fallout4.Prey runs good on everything even 10years old crap.
2500K is huge bottleneck in cpu demanding games.

This exactly. If you pair a 1080Ti with a 2500K you are only going to get between GTX1060 and 1070 performance in games like BF1 online and Fallout 4. The CPU is a big bottleneck. Doesn't mean games won't run perfectly fine in most cases but you're not getting the power of the 1080Ti at all.

Try running some of the games mentioned above and you will see from full usage on the card, unless you force tons of super sampling or run at 4k.

GTX1070 cards and above should be paired with an i7 in an ideal world.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
29,867
This exactly. If you pair a 1080Ti with a 2500K you are only going to get between GTX1060 and 1070 performance in games like BF1 online and Fallout 4. The CPU is a big bottleneck. Doesn't mean games won't run perfectly fine in most cases but you're not getting the power of the 1080Ti at all.

It's a good boost for 'now' though and they'll get another boost when they update their respective platforms :)
 
Associate
OP
Joined
17 Oct 2007
Posts
1,778
Location
Some where in England
Update : I just wanted to report that I am getting very high FPS in games on ultra at 2.5k RES but also Random massive low FPS maybe for like 1 SEC ? - Will go from 150 FPS down to like 30 FPS in some Games ? Is this down to Bottleneck ? If I upgrade to a new i7 7700k will this solve this issue ?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom