My reaction time is rubbish (cognitive tests)
- Thread starter moon man
- Start date
Don
Soldato
If I was a dog I would get the vet to put me down. The only decent score was aiming.
Soldato
Mine was bad which is weird as I've previously measured alright for reaction times. Not sure if phone, website or the fact that my body has decided to practice bahamut's signature move for the last month.
Man of Honour
That was interesting. I scored 119 on the verbal memory, (95.0 percentile) and 8 on the number memory (17.5 percentile). I would have expected it to be more the other way around.
My bottom score was aim trainer at 847ms (2.3 percentile). There goes my dream of competitive gaming. Reaction speed was an average of 207ms though, which isn't at all bad for my age and was probably slowed by my equipment. 75Hz monitor, very poor quality ADSL connection. Also, the lighting in my room is suboptimal and the alignment of the planets is suboptimal and sundry other excuses
I got 10 points on the chimp test, so I reckon I managed to reach chimp level intellect.
Verbal 119
Sequence 13
Reaction 207
Chimp 10
Typing 37
Visual 10
Number 8
Aim 847
My bottom score was aim trainer at 847ms (2.3 percentile). There goes my dream of competitive gaming. Reaction speed was an average of 207ms though, which isn't at all bad for my age and was probably slowed by my equipment. 75Hz monitor, very poor quality ADSL connection. Also, the lighting in my room is suboptimal and the alignment of the planets is suboptimal and sundry other excuses
I got 10 points on the chimp test, so I reckon I managed to reach chimp level intellect.
Verbal 119
Sequence 13
Reaction 207
Chimp 10
Typing 37
Visual 10
Number 8
Aim 847
Last edited:
My sequence one is really bad but the number one i can do an 8 block and then remember the shape of another block if that makes sense like a m+ in a calculator
Last edited:
I did the aim test and the reaction test today at work. Here are the results from my first try at each on my work computer with a basic 60hz monitor and crappy mouse.
Reaction - 200
Aim - 637
However in my second go, I got the following.
Reaction - 198
Aim - 443
I think the Aim test is flawed. The difference between the first and second Aim test for me, was that the targets kept appearing in bunches near to each other in the second test. While on the first test they were all over the place. Which meant that I got a much higher score in the second test as it was far easier. There is a lot more luck involved than any of the other tests.
Reaction - 200
Aim - 637
However in my second go, I got the following.
Reaction - 198
Aim - 443
I think the Aim test is flawed. The difference between the first and second Aim test for me, was that the targets kept appearing in bunches near to each other in the second test. While on the first test they were all over the place. Which meant that I got a much higher score in the second test as it was far easier. There is a lot more luck involved than any of the other tests.
Soldato
I did ok
Associate
My chimp test was so bad 
Aim (432), Reaction (215) and Sequence (9.5) were the best for me, all the rest <50% percentile
Aim (432), Reaction (215) and Sequence (9.5) were the best for me, all the rest <50% percentile