Soldato
wouldn't bother me personally, i've got a huge wang
Snap!
wouldn't bother me personally, i've got a huge wang
Think i know what the job i want will be. Scanning all the hot girls passing through.
--
Btw tho i do have some worries about this new check. Kid scans???
This will simply breed a new wave of enormously breasted female terroists able to hide weapons under each nork.
Personally I'd rather not get blasted by any more radiation than I already recieve every year. I can imagine these causing delays at the airport with the huge number of people who will refuse to do it for various reasons and the number of people who get cancer will probably be greater than the number of people who would ever be killed by terrorist attacks anyway.
Medical
CT (CAT Scan):
Up to 1,000,000 microRem
Chest, Mammography:
Up to 10,000 microRem
Background Radiation
Denver (5000 ft): Up to 600 microRem per day Miami (sea level): Up to 300 microRem per day Inside vs. outside a building: Up to 25 microRem per day
Airline Passenger Dose
One hour flight: Up to 500 microRem per hour
Rapiscan Secure 1000
Less than 10 microRem per exam
Taking those figures into account, at least one person is likely to get cancer, which is greater than the number of people who would have died from a terrorist attack that year.
Are you serious? Are you suggesting we shouldn't have scanners as they are more dangerous that the potential of terrorists?
Taking those figures into account, at least one person is likely to get cancer, which is greater than the number of people who would have died from a terrorist attack that year.
Q: What about exposure levels for individuals who are frequent flyers or for employees in companies or high security facilities who have to be screened each day?
A: Under current international guidelines (such as the ANSI 43.17 Standard) up to 5000 scans per year can be conducted safely.
... they result in more cancer deaths than they prevent.
How can you possibly say you'd rather be blown up than go through a nudiscan?
Chill winston, it was a tongue in cheek comment - no need to get all defensive.
Just because there have been attacks on planes doesn't mean there will be in the future.
It is now a very hard target and not that effective at killing.