Best post so farIs it from Krypton? Appears to have an S on its chest.

Best post so farIs it from Krypton? Appears to have an S on its chest.
Here is a picture of it:
Alien life is only interesting if it's intelligent. I'm sure there is plenty of alien life at the bottom of our deepest oceans.
High-resolution images will be presented to show that the Orgueil filaments are biological in origin and can be interpreted as morphotypes of all known Orders of Cyanobacteriaceae. C/S and C/N ratios will be presented to demonstrate that the forms embedded in the meteorite rock matrix cannot logically be dismissed as post-arrival biological contaminants. It is concluded that the well-preserved, fossilized filaments and dense mats found in Orgueil represent the remains of a complex aquatic and benthic cyanobacterial mat community that grew on the parent body of the meteorite prior to entry into Earth's atmosphere.
Hoover told FoxNews.com: "There are some that are just very strange and don't look like anything that I've been able to identify, and I've shown them to many other experts that have also come up stumped."
Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-20039647-71.html#ixzz1FlccUHIG
Let's believe when we have some real evidence.
Yeah fox news have been granted to allow to lie on t.v, meh but it was published in a journal.
http://journalofcosmology.com/Life100.html
A journal that is going out of business. Seems too convenient that this story would break at such a perfect time.
Dr. Richard Hoover is a highly respected scientist and astrobiologist with a prestigious record of accomplishment at NASA. Given the controversial nature of his discovery, we have invited 100 experts and have issued a general invitation to over 5000 scientists from the scientific community to review the paper and to offer their critical analysis. Our intention is to publish the commentaries, both pro and con, alongside Dr. Hoover's paper. In this way, the paper will have received a thorough vetting, and all points of view can be presented. No other paper in the history of science has undergone such a thorough analysis, and no other scientific journal in the history of science has made such a profoundly important paper available to the scientific community, for comment, before it is published. We believe the best way to advance science, is to promote debate and discussion.
How do you know it is going out of business?
Quoted from their website
Misleading title is misleading. Let's wait this one out for a bit perhaps.
Plagiarised image is also misleading. What is it with all the copying of others' work without credit recently? No-one seems to have any respect for scholarly effort any more.
As for using Faux News as a source. Well, that's just about the final nail in the coffin for this. :/