Soldato
I was fully expecting something along the lines of
NASA hacker speaks
- Thread starter punky_munky
- Start date
Soldato
If that wasn't seriously dumbed down for the reporter's benefit, the guy sounds like a bit of a mickey-mouse hacker.
I don't know if i believe him but getting the disclosure project a bit of publicity isn't a bad thing and he certainly doesn't deserve 60 years in prison for what he's done.
If the whole ufo/tech cover-up is true do most of you really not care where the world is heading in the near future while all the governments are doing is sitting on their hands because they like to keep their greed for power going?
If the whole ufo/tech cover-up is true do most of you really not care where the world is heading in the near future while all the governments are doing is sitting on their hands because they like to keep their greed for power going?
Soldato
Proberly now working for NASA 
Man of Honour
16 mins and 21 secs of total eye to eye contact, his body language (what we could see) looked normal and he didn't waver once with his speech and answered every question with no stuttering.
I believe he did what he did but I think he made the rest of the stuff up about UFO's.
I believe he did what he did but I think he made the rest of the stuff up about UFO's.
Associate
Oracle said:
No no not wiki. Google. And not just random spook sites but reputable ones to. Go have fun
A5H said:
I wonder what your comment would have been if you'de watched http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1166743665260900218&q=disclosure
- Joined
- 17 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 3,015
That videos nearly 2 hours long... you got anything more watchable to entice us?
Permabanned
punky_munky said:
I saw him on TV this morning, presumably the same interview in the link? I thought he was very articulate, bit of a geek of course, but a lot more clever than most.
When he was asked if he thought the alien spaceship picture he found at NASA might have been an artists impression or something ... I'd have preferred if he could concede it might have been, instead he stated he's convinced its the real deal
building on his moment of fame maybe or just trying to justify his excuse for hacking?Perhaps he should go out more? but I wouldn't just condemn him as being full of crap, once the court case goes through and assuming he'll get let off lightly, his notoriety should keep him in work and wealthy for the rest of his life if he plays his cards right.
Soldato
How so? Have you actually Google'd "Dr Steven Greer" - the guy running the "Disclosure Project"? He's a bit of a shady fellow. He's an author of several books and is making an absolute killing out of this. He uses copyrighted material at his paid-for seminars and describes his organisation as non-profit when it is clearly selling goods for profit on its website.Radiation said:
http://www.rense.com/general10/mitch.htm
Last edited:
Associate
How this "hacker" described his attack is quite plausible. I see no reason to disbelieve him.
What he says he found? Who knows? What damage did he cause? Who knows?
What he says he found? Who knows? What damage did he cause? Who knows?
Soldato
...? That it?Ex-RoNiN said:
Associate
i take it firewalls were non existant whenever he did it??? surely they must have some way of blocking external IP's.
Im not saying he didnt do it, but it just seems too easy.
Im not saying he didnt do it, but it just seems too easy.
Last edited: