-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Caporegime
If they get this working on the Tensor cores, I would be interested. Seems a bit daft to run it without, when I have the hardware that is capable!
At last free amd ray tracing for every one 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=LtO8dxAsp3w&feature=emb_logo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=LtO8dxAsp3w&feature=emb_logoMakes you wonder if it is something that NVidia could do at a driver level?
Caporegime
1440P - 6635 at Ultra.
Not without some serious hacking/interception of the code - there is a lot done via a mixture of software and general compute to get the results rather than something that is presented to the drivers to provide a direct result that nVidia could offload.
Man of Honour
2160p Ultra
Soldato
Devs have already said its down to the game developer if they want to use hardware for Ray Tracing on the GPU.
I'm guessing you were getting around 60 fps.
If it works like the final fantasy xv demo then it takes your fps with two decimals and multiples it up to thousands.
So a score of 5240 would mean an average fps of 52.40
That is just my guess anyway hahah
Lol having to make an account and install a launcher.
Did my first run with the benchmark.
2560x1440 Ultra.
8700k 5ghz, 2080ti @ 2100mhz
Score: 9890
If I remove the overclock, the score is 9350. So a pretty poor boost from a overclock - expected though with what we've seen - ray tracing doesn't respond that well to core overclocks, it likes memory overclocks that give it more bandwidth but I don't overclock my memory.
Did my first run with the benchmark.
2560x1440 Ultra.
8700k 5ghz, 2080ti @ 2100mhz
Score: 9890
If I remove the overclock, the score is 9350. So a pretty poor boost from a overclock - expected though with what we've seen - ray tracing doesn't respond that well to core overclocks, it likes memory overclocks that give it more bandwidth but I don't overclock my memory.
Man of Honour
Core overclocks work well for me.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 27 Sep 2019
- Posts
- 2,570
500 higher score may be a lot in this benchmark bit new to get baseline yet.
Soldato
1080p 15687
1440p 10202
2160p 5198
All ultra
3900x + 2080ti
Lovely
1440p 10202
2160p 5198
All ultra
3900x + 2080ti
Lovely
Last edited:
Associate
i7 3770k / rtx 2080
1440p
vh: 8622
ultra: 6971
1440p
vh: 8622
ultra: 6971
Soldato
I wonder if this new engine is for a crysis game ?
I ran the benchmark at 340x1440 on ultra and got a score of 6702. A second run at 4k got me 4236. I had Task Manager, GPU-Z and SIV running. The CPU was barely exercised but my RTX 2080 Ti was maxxed. I'll have to try overclocking it.
At 3440x1440 I got a solid 60-90 fps, mostly between 70 and 80, except for the close-up on the bullet casings where it dropped to 55 fps.
So, i7-8700, RTX 2080 Ti, 32 GB RAM, Nvidia Driver 436.88, ultra settings:
1080p: 12594, 120-150 fps
1440UW: 6702, 55-90 fps
2160p: 4236, 37-59 fps
Edit: 2160p Very High setting: 5323 and a solid 50-65 fps with a dip to 45 around the bullet casings.
At 3440x1440 I got a solid 60-90 fps, mostly between 70 and 80, except for the close-up on the bullet casings where it dropped to 55 fps.
So, i7-8700, RTX 2080 Ti, 32 GB RAM, Nvidia Driver 436.88, ultra settings:
1080p: 12594, 120-150 fps
1440UW: 6702, 55-90 fps
2160p: 4236, 37-59 fps
Edit: 2160p Very High setting: 5323 and a solid 50-65 fps with a dip to 45 around the bullet casings.
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Volta likes this benchmark.
2160p Ultra
Not bad for a 2 year old air cooled card.
2160p Ultra
Not bad for a 2 year old air cooled card.