Dead pixel policy of most companies are rubbish. I still dont understand why its fine for one person to get a better deal than another on a brand new item just through luck alone. I'm I being fussy?
Hate dead pixels![]()
you mean like how one person gets a better overclocking CPU?
Nobody forces you to buy the stuff, you get a choice, you know that there is a chance of dead pixels and that some manufacturers/retailers deem a few dead pixels as acceptable.
still not pics?!!!!![]()
its extreme high end gaming, file server in a multi user environment as well as audio and video editing. its all round use (for me) but isnce i do everything from web development to 3d animation/rendering i need a lot of power. I will be waiting for the next gen cards, i was just using the current top as a place holder for price. Its not 8 TB of HDD space either, its 6 1tb drives, which would be used in RAID 5 = 5TB of space. or 4 drives = 3TB of space. My current system with 1.7TB of space only have 60gb free so meh.
I am looking to cut cost though. is ddr 3 really not that much better/useful still?
I would be looking at 8GB for £400 which i know is still expensive but i still remember buying 2GB of Corsair DDR400 for 199£ lol
avoid quad sli if you can, it scales really badly and is quite a waste of money, I know you've got the £ but why waste it?
you say i wont use even 1tb of space? i currently have around 40GB free in my system and its got 1.7TB of space, and that is all going ot be copied over onto the new machine due to RAID back up etc.
Quad SLI is bad as it scales badly and the limited memory bandwidth isnt good for gaming at 2560 res.
Unless there is a dedicated RAID-5 controller in there the performance on those 6 HDDs will be terrible. On-board RAID controllers are bad for anything other than RAID-0 or RAID-1 (and not great for them either). With the budget for this I would've spent the £300 or so needed to have a decent RAID controller - it would make much more of a difference than a lot of the other wastage on this project.