• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

New graphics card - £170-£240 range

@spoffle, isn't in game performance the entire point of a graphics card?

The GTX 660Ti performs perfectly well at 1080p full stop

Okay, so let's all go out and buy 660Tis at £500 because they're good enough for 1080p, right?

I don't understand what you're having difficulty with. Why would you want to spend the same money for less performance?

Is this a really bad case of purchase justification syndrome or something? You want others to buy 660Tis because they're "good enough" because you have one that's "good enough"?

Would you buy a 380ml can of coke for the same price as a 500ml bottle of coke just because?

I wouldn't see any benefit other than in benchmarks - and even then I would have to overclock the HD 7950 to see a significant advantage.

That argument would work if we were talking more performance for more money, we're talking more performance for the same money.

As for forewarned is forearmed, the OP can make a choice on graphics cards and wisely omit the MSi HD 7950 from his short list, however I do believe that some of the Sapphire cards have a similar fault.

Well according to you, the only answer to this thread is a 660Ti, so you're not really forewarning him against an MSI 7950. As for the Sapphire cards, what issue is this? You're not going to post an example of a Sapphire card misbehaving and claim it's doing the same thing are you?

That goes to show that you actually are claiming it's an AMD problem though, despite the fact that plenty of people have 7950s that are fine.
 
Considering they're comparing the stock 7950 at 800 MHz and a half decent 7950 will overclock by 50% to 1200 the gap is in reality significantly higher. On stock volts it should be touch 1000 MHz. With the 600 series if you get a stinker you can't throw more volts at them to compensate either.

When both were at a decent overclock the 7950 was still a chunk faster prior to 12.11. Now it's not even close.

Anyway this isn't a 660Ti purchase justification thread and I'm a little tired of you ignoring good points and focusing on the same tired reasonings that somehow all 7950s are prone to failure. You're just coming across as a bit dim by doing it constantly.
 
Well according to you, the only answer to this thread is a 660Ti

I'm currently trying to decide on a graphics card for my first home build (so excuse any newbish questions).

I've been looking at the GTX 660 TI at the upper end, but also more budget options in the GTX 660 / 560TI.

What Nvidia cards in the price range would you recommend?

Also, I'm interested in using SLI further down the line and am currently looking at this motherboard:

ASRock Z77 Pro4 Intel Z77 (Socket 1155) DDR3 Motherboard

Is there a better alternative I should use, or is that one ok?

The only answer to the OP was an nVidia GTX 660 Ti.

OP has been back since then to say that he would consider ATi.
 
Well, thanks for all the input, people. Lots of food for thought!

In answer to an early question, I'm not really looking to play brand new games on ultra settings, but being able to play, say, Far Cry 3 on medium/medium-high would be cool if possible.

Anyway, if the 660Ti is a little overpriced atm (which seems to be a consensus, regardless of the rather fierce debate regarding the reliability and general quality of the cards), does the NVidia/ATi balance shift with a smaller budget?
Say I was going to spend £180, do Nvidia cards become cost-effective again? Some preliminary searches on here would appear to indicate not, but have I missed anything important?
Also, what third-party manufacturers (gigabyte, EVGA, Frozr, etc - not sure if 'third-party' is the right word) would people recommend?

Lastly, if I wanted to SLI/Crossfire in the future, would it be better to use the same manufacturer (say, gigabyte), or does it really not matter?
*To clarify, I know that you can't mix SLI and Crossfire, I'm not that noobish!*
 
The 660 is quite decent and compares with the 7850 (and beats it in most games). As for SLI/CF, you can use any brand. If you are going with a 660, I would go with EVGA/Gigabyte/MSI purely for warranty and for the 7850, I would go with Gigabyte/MSI...I wouldn't get a MSI 7950 though, as they are having heat issues at the moment.
 
When both were at a decent overclock the 7950 was still a chunk faster prior to 12.11. Now it's not even close.

Anyway this isn't a 660Ti purchase justification thread and I'm a little tired of you ignoring good points and focusing on the same tired reasonings that somehow all 7950s are prone to failure. You're just coming across as a bit dim by doing it constantly.

You have not made any good points. I have countered each and every argument you have made.

Why don't you just say, "The HD 7950 overclocks better than the GTX 660 Ti" (once you have ***** about sending them back until you get a good one 1!)

With that I could not disagree.
 
I ignored that bit because as you say I still think he doesn't see it was an MSI problem not an AMD problem even though the forums are full of people saying so :(.

There's only so many ways you can explain the same point before you realise the blinkers are on.




Reposted again...

It really does look like that. :rolleyes:

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Catalyst_12.11_Performance/23.html

Where is the significant advantage with the HD 7950? (considering that they were exactly the same price when I bought mine?)

Or do I have to keep sending my HD 7950 back until I find one that stays cool under crazy overclocks?

Again, you're being silly. No one has to "keep sending 7950s back". The general consensus is to avoid MSI Twin Frozrs at the moment anyway, other cards are fine.

HIS 7950 X2s seem to be amongst the better ones and have been getting very good reviews (which is why I chose them). They are available for around £240 too.

Relative performance charts simply don't work, you just have to look at how close all the cards are there to see that.

In real world terms a 660Ti is 7870 performance stock versus stock, and can't touch an overclocked 7870, never mind a 7950.
 
The 660 is quite decent and compares with the 7850 (and beats it in most games). As for SLI/CF, you can use any brand. If you are going with a 660, I would go with EVGA/Gigabyte/MSI purely for warranty and for the 7850, I would go with Gigabyte/MSI...I wouldn't get a MSI 7950 though, as they are having heat issues at the moment.

I do think however that GTX 660 SLi is possibly nVidias best 'bang for buck' solution at around £320.
 
Well, thanks for all the input, people. Lots of food for thought!

In answer to an early question, I'm not really looking to play brand new games on ultra settings, but being able to play, say, Far Cry 3 on medium/medium-high would be cool if possible.

Anyway, if the 660Ti is a little overpriced atm (which seems to be a consensus, regardless of the rather fierce debate regarding the reliability and general quality of the cards), does the NVidia/ATi balance shift with a smaller budget?
Say I was going to spend £180, do Nvidia cards become cost-effective again? Some preliminary searches on here would appear to indicate not, but have I missed anything important?
Also, what third-party manufacturers (gigabyte, EVGA, Frozr, etc - not sure if 'third-party' is the right word) would people recommend?

Lastly, if I wanted to SLI/Crossfire in the future, would it be better to use the same manufacturer (say, gigabyte), or does it really not matter?
*To clarify, I know that you can't mix SLI and Crossfire, I'm not that noobish!*

Generally, nVidia are struggling with the value aspect, they don't really have anything that competes at the same price levels. If you want nVidia you have to pay the "nVidia tax" essentially.

If you're interested in Farcy 3, it would make sense for you to get a 7950 since they come with Farcy 3 free anyway, as well as Hitman Absolution and Sleeping Dogs which should be enough to bring it inline with your £180 budget if you were intending on getting those games anyway.
 
I received a HIS 7950 iceq boost today and its brilliant so would recommend that. Seriously fast and literally cant hear it at all. Maybe i have not played anything thats really pushed it to its limits but thus far i havent heard it at all.
 
You have not made any good points. I have countered each and every argument you have made.

Why don't you just say, "The HD 7950 overclocks better than the GTX 660 Ti" (once you have ***** about sending them back until you get a good one 1!)

With that I could not disagree.

What you mean all the points I have made where it is shown to be counter intuitive to spend the same money for a worse product? :rolleyes:

I suggest you re-read the thread.

The points you can't counter - because you're being ridiculous as illustrated by your comment above which still somehow maintains that the 7950s have a high chance of failure - have been ignored and 'countered' with the same nonsense being posted again.

So you haven't really countered mine or anyone's argument at all. You may have done in your head but your posts show that in your head is a very different place to reality.
 
Last edited:
They work when it suits!!

No they don't, I'll never say relative performance charts work because they don't.

It's a poor averaging. You ignored the bit where I pointed out that according to those charts, there's very little between a 660Ti and all the other cards though.

That alone is enough to show you why they don't work. Any anomalies will completely skew the results to the point where they are meaningless, for example Shogun 2, or Starcraft, where the 660Ti is right next to a 7970 in their benchmarks.
 
The 660 is quite decent and compares with the 7850 (and beats it in most games). As for SLI/CF, you can use any brand. If you are going with a 660, I would go with EVGA/Gigabyte/MSI purely for warranty and for the 7850, I would go with Gigabyte/MSI...I wouldn't get a MSI 7950 though, as they are having heat issues at the moment.

Cool, thanks for the advice. I've already heard good things about Gigabyte from a couple of sources, so it's reassuring that they're well spoken of here as well.

Generally, nVidia are struggling with the value aspect, they don't really have anything that competes at the same price levels. If you want nVidia you have to pay the "nVidia tax" essentially.

If you're interested in Farcy 3, it would make sense for you to get a 7950 since they come with Farcy 3 free anyway, as well as Hitman Absolution and Sleeping Dogs which should be enough to bring it inline with your £180 budget if you were intending on getting those games anyway.

I hadn't thought of it like that, but since I will be getting FC3 and Hitman Absolution anyway, it's a good point.
I've not got a games bundle with a component before - do you get a download code or something?
I also note that it says 'subject to availability' - not to be paranoid, but they do actually give you the games, right? ;)
 
They do indeed. I bought 2x 7950s recently and got 2 copies of each game.

You register the key from the card on the AMD website, and then codes for the games are emailed to you.

Sleeping Dogs and Hitman are Steam keys (so you just put them in to Steam and the games are added to your Steam account) and Farcry 3 is a UPlay code (UPlay is Ubisoft's answer to Steam and Origin).

Actually, just checking, I've ended up with 4 copies of Sleeping Dogs :eek: :p
 
Back
Top Bottom