• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

New graphics card - £170-£240 range

Sorry Rusty, you seem to have been beaten to it this time ;)

Well, the nature of a forum means that if one person says something there's no problem seconding, thirding etc what somebody else has said. Otherwise threads are going to be a bit boring if it's say a two-sided debate and one person takes one side and another takes the other and one is eccentric and the other is reasonable.... and that's it... two posts on the thread.

Sorry to be the one to explain this to you on how discussions work on a forum! :p
 
Well, the nature of a forum means that if one person says something there's no problem seconding, thirding etc what somebody else has said. Otherwise threads are going to be a bit boring if it's say a two-sided debate and one person takes one side and another takes the other and one is eccentric and the other is reasonable.... and that's it... two posts on the thread.

Sorry to be the one to explain this to you on how discussions work on a forum! :p

Which is exactly why I pointed out that the GTX 660 Ti wasn't poor at all, just currently overpriced for what it is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have just picked up Batman off the Steam sale. I am running it maxed out, admittedly with only 4 x AA and it looks and plays fantastic.

Extreme detail and high tesselation.

I suspect that the i7 helps though, games and programs have never been smoother, cracking CPU.
 
Which is exactly why I pointed out that the GTX 660 Ti wasn't pooor at all, just currently overpriced for what it is.

I was responding to your comment which suggested there was some kind of problem recommending an AMD card when somebody already has:

I (sic) was suggested in the 2nd post?

Regarding:

I suspect that the i7 helps though, games and programs have never been smoother, cracking CPU.

I'm not entirely convinced it helps much at all for single GPUs. Most benchmarks show it doesn't at max settings and 1080p. Even multi-GPU set-up's gain only a little in my experience.

It is a great CPU though and if the prices of i7's remain pretty close to i5's I won't go back to an i5.
 
Last edited:
I looked more like another attack on the 660Ti than it did a recommendation for the HD 7950? :confused:

I wouldn't bother. The 660Ti is comparatively poor to the 7950.

From what I have read, I think i'm the only person who has a GTX 660 Ti :D

I expect that the price of these cards will plummet before long as everyone seems to go for either the GTX 670 or the HD 7950.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It is a great CPU though and if the prices of i7's remain pretty close to i5's I won't go back to an i5.

I agree, I came from an i5 750 @3.4 GHz and I much prefer the i7.

Sold the i5 because I had problems with the socket 1156 mobo.
 
I looked more like another attack on the 660Ti than it did a recommendation for the HD 7950? :confused:

Well that's just a statement of fact. It is poor compared to a 7950 on paper and in games. It's not surprising though the 660Ti's competitor is hierarchically a 7870. It's like comparing a 580 to a 6970 or a 7970 GHz Ed to a 670...

They're just in different places these cards and the only thing that binds a 660Ti to a 7950 is its price which is actually quite poor on nVidia's side when you consider a 7950 is a clearly better card in comparison. Their pricing has been pretty poor since AMDs prices dropped actually which doesn't matter to people who have purchased already. But in a way it just means they can't compete for neutral buyers who have no real preference as AMD offer both better value for money and a better games package (IMO).
 
Last edited:
I must admit, I was shocked when I looked the price of the GTX 660 Ti had risen!

I have nothing good at all to say about the HD 7950 (as you know) mine didn't work properly. I am also glad I didn't RMA it as I was unable to reliably reproduce the faults.

(also glad I didn't due to the high failure rate of the MSi card)

The ONLY place you will notice that the GTX 660 TI is slower than the HD 7950 is in resolutions higher than mine and benchmarks, you do realise that don't you?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have nothing good at all to say about the HD 7950 (as you know) mine didn't work properly. I am also glad I didn't RMA it as I was unable to reliably reproduce the faults.

Well that's a little illogical don't you think? Your problem wasn't the HD7950 it was more than likely the board partners problem.

To base an opinion on one faulty model is not really thinking I can pretend to understand fully... especially as (dodgy MSI batch aside) the chances of getting a failed card are pretty much the same on both side.

What if you got a dodgy 660Ti as well after some hellish luck?

The ONLY place you will notice that the GTX 660 TI is slower than the HD 7950 is in resolutions higher than mine and benchmarks, you do realise that don't you?

Wrong. If you replace 7950 with 7870 then I'll agree :). The 7950 is comparable to the 670 unless of course you're suggesting your little 660Ti is as good as a 670 now to the naked eye?

'Notice' is a subjective verb anyway in this context. I would notice anything under what a 7950 provides and this is the minimum performance I am happy with. I even toyed with going crossfire for a single screen to get more FPS. For the money it's stonking... providing at 1080p only 8% less performance than my one in a million GTX 680.

The argument that you won't notice the difference being used as a basis to buy a fundamentally inferior card is inherently flawed. It's so flawed infact I won't even unpick it! :)
 
Last edited:
I must admit, I was shocked when I looked the price of the GTX 660 Ti had risen!

I have nothing good at all to say about the HD 7950 (as you know) mine didn't work properly. I am also glad I didn't RMA it as I was unable to reliably reproduce the faults.

(also glad I didn't due to the high failure rate of the MSi card)

Your card was a one off bad experience- you shouldn't let that become the deciding factor straight away. That could have just as easily happened with your 660Ti.
As Rusty pointed out, the fault was almost certainly down to the board partner- not AMD with a faulty 7950 GPU.
 
Your card was a one off bad experience- you shouldn't let that become the deciding factor straight away.

It was easier to 'go back to what you know'

I am not calling the HD 7950 (other than the MSi one(s))

I just didn't have the cash to keep sending them back, also I was one of the first to have issues, therefore we didn't realise the scope of the problem at that stage.
 
It was easier to 'go back to what you know'

I am not calling the HD 7950 (other than the MSi one(s))

I just didn't have the cash to keep sending them back, also I was one of the first to have issues, therefore we didn't realise the scope of the problem at that stage.

When did you roughly buy your msi 7950?
 
What if you got a dodgy 660Ti as well after some hellish luck?

If you remember, I put it down to garbage ATi not garbage MSi - as this was realised later.

I will admit, I bought an ATi card expecting it to be inferior to nVidia, and I wasn't surprised at all when it was.

(I was hoping to be pleasantly surprised)
 
Kinda shocked the faulty batch even existed back in september I thought it occurred around October. I took the chance on buying one around mid October thank god I was one of the lucky ones.

It's not really clear if this was from the dreaded faulty batch or just a dodgy one that sneaked through the QA net or even user error.

The faulty batch was more to do with heat and as a result noise... his was just performing pants from memory.
 
Noise isn't a problem anyhow, seeing that i'm partially deaf!

The card worked fine (most of the time) I just got the occasional artifact flash, so fast it was gone as soon as you had seen it.

Also lousy WoT performance, but only on certain maps. :confused:

Like I have said, it was too vague to RMA it.
 
Back
Top Bottom