• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

New graphics card needed

Associate
Joined
28 Mar 2006
Posts
2,172
Location
Winsford, Cheshire
Hello there, seems like a good forum to get advice from so here I go. Im wanting a new graphics card, I have a 6600gt 256 mb at the mo, but instead of spending money on booze and other wastes of money I want to get a new graphics card. I should have about £380 to spend maybe push to £400, I have been looking at loads of cards, and to be quite honest my heads full of it and I need some time served impartial advice, so do your worst people!

Thanks in advance
 
Another option is the X1900XTX.

Putting aside all of the heat / noise / power usage nonsense (user opinion only) then the cards are pratically identical with the X1900XTX nudging the 7900GTX out of the top spot once you throw in some AA and AF into the mix.

Google some reviews of both and buy whichever you prefer. (I personally would go for which ever you can the cheapest)
 
oweneades said:
Another option is the X1900XTX.

Putting aside all of the heat / noise / power usage nonsense (user opinion only) then the cards are pratically identical with the X1900XTX nudging the 7900GTX out of the top spot once you throw in some AA and AF into the mix.

Google some reviews of both and buy whichever you prefer. (I personally would go for which ever you can the cheapest)


I'm sorry but user opinion doesn't come into the equation.

The x1900XTX is the more power hungry/noiser and hotter card.FACT.

The performance is on par with each other with 7900 GTX beating the x1900 xtx in some games and vice versa.

Let this not be an NV versus ATI thread.

The power requirements and heat issues and noise is enough for someone to sway for the 7900 GTX a clearly better designed GFX card.
 
Sapphire ATI Radeon X1900 XT-X is about £380

XFX GeForce 7900 GTX 512MB GDDR3 is the same price

Cant go to the extreme model of the above as thats over budget for me. I have xfx 6600gt at the moment never have any problems with it. Mite stick with nvidia
 
if you have a 6600gt now i'm wondering what the rest of your specs are? you may see more for your money if you get a slightly slower card and upgrade your pc elsewhere aswell.

Something like the OcUK GeForce 7900 GT 256MB GDDR3 @ £222 would leave you with another £100+ to upgrade something else. More ram, better cpu ect. That's the smart mans choice;)

easyrider, no need to jump on him lol
 
james.miller said:
if you have a 6600gt now i'm wondering what the rest of your specs are? you may see more for your money if you get a slightly slower card and upgrade your pc elsewhere aswell.

Something like the OcUK GeForce 7900 GT 256MB GDDR3 @ £222 would leave you with another £100+ to upgrade something else. More ram, better cpu ect. That's the smart mans choice;)

easyrider, no need to jump on him lol

The 7900 GT is a great card, I had one it clocked amazingly well.It might be worth posting your spec actually as you don't want your cpu crippling the power of the GTX :D

Never jumped on him lol :p
 
So long as your system won't be CPU limited, I'd recommend an Nvidia card due to the problems as stated by a few people regarding the ATi cards. If your budget is £380-£400, there's no denying that a GeForce 7900GTX would be a worthy choice. :)

Wish I had that budget to spend. :p Still hoping a few 7900GTX will fall to £350 inc VAT to replace this Voodoo. Though heard that limited stocks are going to be in effect until mid April. :(
 
Last edited:
easyrider said:
I'm sorry but user opinion doesn't come into the equation.

QUOTE]

Um yes it does actually. Simply because some people don't really care or are not bothered that the card uses more power or runs hotter. As long as the card doesn't cause problems then that shouldn't be the issue.

Currently the X1900XTX is significantly cheaper than any of the 7900GTX's (over £60 in some cases) and even though the 7900GTX may be the better designed card the price difference versus potential benefits is not justified.

At the end of the day both cards offer equal performance so it comes down to whether you will spend the extra and get the 7900GTX or save money and get the X1900XTX and live with its minor drawbacks.
 
they arent minor drawbacks for some people though, that's what you have to realise. yes it is all about your opinion and what you want from it, but at the end of the day the nvidia's are proving to be the better all round cards at this time. I would pay the extra to have a cooler less power hungry card. But at the same time, i'd buy a GT over a GTX.
 
Just noticed there is a 7900GTX availble for just over £380 which for them is a relative bargin and outweighs any of what I said above lol.

Ignore me I am tired. :)
 
oweneades said:
Um yes it does actually. Simply because some people don't really care or are not bothered that the card uses more power or runs hotter. As long as the card doesn't cause problems then that shouldn't be the issue.

Currently the X1900XTX is significantly cheaper than any of the 7900GTX's (over £60 in some cases) and even though the 7900GTX may be the better designed card the price difference versus potential benefits is not justified.

At the end of the day both cards offer equal performance so it comes down to whether you will spend the extra and get the 7900GTX or save money and get the X1900XTX and live with its minor drawbacks.

That 60 quid is irrelavant when people are spending 30 quid on the zalman VF900 just so they can hear themselves think.

The saphire x1900 is £380 and the
Leadtek GeForce 7900 GTX is £380

so i don't see where this 60 quid is coming from? :confused:

Minor drawbacks?

having a hotter ambient temp leads to running fans higher meaning more noise.Meaning a pain in the backside. :p
 
Last edited:
oweneades said:
Just noticed there is a 7900GTX availble for just over £380 which for them is a relative bargin and outweighs any of what I said above lol.

Ignore me I am tired. :)


you posted that as i was writing now i will have to edit my thread! :p
 
Ive got a p4 630, and i cant get anymore ram, got 2gb of ocz platinum, which is sweet as, plus ive got someone that wants to buy my old graphics card which is also helping the budget a little, ive had no problems with this gfx card, so i think im going to stick with nvidia, shame on the ocuk website all the 512mb 7900gtxs are on preorder :(
 
FYI. The ATI X1900XT is only slightly slower than the X1900XTX. Considering these are a fair bit cheaper at no realworld perfromance loss, you may want to have a look at these prices too.
 
Oh gawd. Either are fine. I put it this way, if anyone is buying a GTX/XTX, then they must have a decent PSU already, ruling power out - I mean what actually is the difference? GTX, must be about 95W full load maybe, the XTX, probably about 120W. Those figures are roughly right. Wow, 25W! The heat issue is far more important. Then again, the ATis use direct heat exhaust, so a lot of dumped out of the case and the nV's don't seem as efficient at this, so they turn up almost equal heatwise. And I must say, people, if it's stable, does it matter the temp? I'm sure some people must watch their temp monitoring programs the way they go on. I admit, if you have a SFF, then the nV is probably the best way to go, however, most of us with ATX cases know good airflow is a must. I don't think it's that productive arguing the same point over and over. Has someone calculated the specific air temp difference? I'm sure it would only be say 3C max as air has a decent heat capacity and flowing air can draw a lot of heat away (hence the need for decent airflow).

I say, buy whichever is cheapest reasonably and suits your needs in terms of the games you play etc. IQ is practically the same, everything is the same. If you've had nV, stick with it - it's so much easier. When I made the jump from nV to ATi after the FX farce, I couldn't get anything right (drivers etc).
 
So if you put aside the problems witht he ATI (noise/heat/power) would you say they are both pretty similar, obviously with each being different in different games.

I have heard ATi have better image quality, is this user opinion or a fact?

Reason i ask is i have just bought an X1900XT for £300, bit worried now as everyone is suggesting the 7900 over it.
 
ScarySquirrel said:
So if you put aside the problems witht he ATI (noise/heat/power) would you say they are both pretty similar, obviously with each being different in different games.

I have heard ATi have better image quality, is this user opinion or a fact?

Reason i ask is i have just bought an X1900XT for £300, bit worried now as everyone is suggesting the 7900 over it.
Enjoy the XT. There is always arguing in this forum :D. Some people prefer the ATi IQ but unless you actually stop and stand still, you'll never notice it so it's pointless to argue over it. The difference is miniscule and usually I'm running around shooting things :D. An XT for £300 is a stonking deal and not to be scorned. Rest assured you have one of the top 3 graphics cards currently available.
 
smids said:
so they turn up almost equal heatwise. And I must say, people, if it's stable, does it matter the temp?

I'm sorry but that is just not true.

answer me this?

Why buy a noiser hotter card that uses more power and performs the same for the same outlay?


Regardless of wether people see these issues relevant to them or not the facts remain.

And saying these issues don't matter is not helping the op in my book :)
He should be made aware of these issues to make an informed choice.
 
Back
Top Bottom