• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

New Intel 13th gen cpus - anyone buying one?

Waiting for high power SFX and SFX-L psu's to launch this year before i go jumping into upgrades. SFX has been at a standstill for awhile with psu limitations unfortunately so until that gets fixed, 13900k and a 4090 will have to wait.
 
Isn't the 13500 an older Alder Lake design just with a 13th gen name printed on it?

Had a brief search, all I can really find to back that up is some rumours from wccftech (and two or three other sites reporting the same sort of rumours from last August). Got any other sources of info that might back it up? I'm not so much doubting you as I'd like to know more, as I'm interested in one of these processors.

It does look like the non-K parts have a smaller L2, 11.5MB -
vs 20MB

But I can't see any indication that there might be older architectures in there. The K parts seem to have a higher max memory bandwidth too. Given that and the cache I'd probably go for a KF anyway actually...

(edit - it looks like it might be right, if you look at CPU-Z published results, the stepping for the 13500 is the same as for 12600k, C0, but the 13600K is a B0 stepping. Is there a difference beyond the amount of cache though? Feh. The 600KF is barely more expensive than the 500, so I guess I'll plan on shelling out the extra $50)
 
Last edited:
I'm going to be upgrading shortly to 13500 and DDR4 B760 board.

I currently have 10400 so going from 6 to 14 cores is a big jump.

I realise that DDR4 is EOL but honestly I won't be upgrading for another 4-5 years and DDR6 will probably be out by then.
 
Played a little more with the 13500 and I have dialed in a -125mV offset and put the PL1 to 88W for decent all-round performance for my level of cooler. Also this CPU idles at about 9 Watts Vs my previous 5600X of 30 Watts
 
In every processor range, there are "sweet spots".
I looked at lots of options, I came to the conclusion that 13500 and 13700 with DDR4 were the best value for money.
13900 is for getting towards the top of the league tables ... but it runs hotter and uses more power.
 
Last edited:
I looked at lots of options, I came to the conclusion that 13500 ...

For whatever reason, the non-K i5 parts are using Alder Lake P cores, not Raptor lake, and have reduced cache as a result.

It may be that the 13500 is a great part, but that would put me off. The 13600KF is only a little more expensive, and that would make it worth it for me, even if not overclocking.
 
It may be that the 13500 is a great part, but that would put me off. The 13600KF is only a little more expensive, and that would make it worth it for me, even if not overclocking.

For me, the i5-13500 is the choice for productivity or mixed gaming/creating. I'd be more tempted by a 7600 non-X for only-gaming, then upgrade it with an X3D or 9600X in 3-4 years.
 
Back
Top Bottom