Yeh its handy, You can hide it down to that and then reopen it again, gd if you want all your task bar back when working on something but dont want to close opera.![]()
I don't have any but i'd hazzard a guess they are stored somewhere in %appdata% just type that into a windows explorer window, go to opera and have a check from there on...
Doing the same. I'm seeing about 30mb difference between 9.2 and 9.5 in the favour of Kestrel.Ok thanks will check that out.
This version of opera is a lot better in terms of memory usage, I have the exact same tabs open on 9.2 and this 9.5, and memory usage is about 20mb difference
Doing th same. I'm seeing about 30mb difference between 9.2 and 9.5 in the favour of Kestrel.![]()
Doing th same. I'm seeing about 30mb difference between 9.2 and 9.5 in the favour of Kestrel.![]()
Opera 9.23 is that? Well I'll try the minimising trick. You learn something new everyday eh!
Thats because the memory isn't actually used by opera itself its something to do with windows. Same with a lot of other software when minimised. Windows overheads cause the extra memory to be flushed when minimised... I can't remember exactly why right now, but i've read something on this matter somewhere![]()
Btw done the searches for 9.5. Quite impressed with Kestrel. Just seems quicker at loading pages.
I've turned the Speed dial page off. Hardly used it really. Just see a blank page now.
Didn't turn it off for speed. Just because I don't use it.I don't use speed dial all to much, but i don't bother turning it off because it doesn't do any hard as in it works like a blank page, its no slower to load up and i get 9 shortcuts to webpages...
Inline find. CTRL + F? Seems OK to me.II will agree though it could all be in my head, but it seems a LOT quicker, and Opera wasn't any slouch to begin with... Still i'm having trouble enabling inline find its really annoying me now, any ideas? Also i wish my wand workeddoes yours?