Its not Free-Sync ^^^^^
Its £456.
No is not. You looked at the wrong monitor.
XL2730Z is fantastic![]()
Its £456.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
No is not. You looked at the wrong monitor.
XL2730Z is fantastic![]()
No is not. You looked at the wrong monitor.
XL2730Z is fantastic![]()
Its not Free-Sync ^^^^^
The saying "you get what you pay for " comes to mind..Free-Sync at 1440P is pretty dire, i know i was recently looking and gave up.
G-Sync is even worse.
https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18739709
Yes, there is a standard agreed upon now.Is there a HDR standard at the moment? How many bits are we talking?
I know that - I mentioned it in my post. I was just pointing out a good monitor for gaming and other tasks that is in your budget range.
If you want a 1440p monitor designed specifically for gaming then good luck trying to find one under £400.
The saying "you get what you pay for " comes to mind..![]()
If i'm looking to spend £300 on a GPU i'm not going to spend near £500 on a screen am i?
If 1440P Free-Sync is around the £400+ mark its really defeating the objective of it
Yes, there is a standard agreed upon now.
10-bit color.
90% P3 color gamut
1000 nits brightness
Yes, there is a standard agreed upon now.
10-bit color.
90% P3 color gamut
1000 nits brightness
Well, there are a lot of good 1440P screen for around the £250 - £300 mark, not one of them Free-Sync, well, one, with a useless range.
it seems to me they are trying to use it as a feature to drive sales of very expensive screens, which is really cynical and completely flawed, people who spend that kind of money on screens are more often not looking for Free-Sync than those in the lower price bracket.
So something that doesn't exist (HDR monitor) dictates your purchasing decisions?![]()
Everything's about the monitor as far as I understand. Not really sure what was ever stopping modern GPU's from being able to process this in general, it was mainly about the application actually outputting the full HDR signal and having a display that could display it.Sorry to sound like a broken record then, but if it's just 10bit that the GPU has to render and chuck out, that's nothing special, nor taxing for it surely?. The rest is just monitor right? It just seems to be that we need the game devs to get on board and the monitor tech at hand.
The vast majority of PC gamers(and gamers in general) get along with 60hz displays just fine.Would you really consider a 60hz monitor for gaming?
Yes. I like to get on the bus that is leaving, not the one that is arriving. Given I expect to want a HDR monitor when available, it makes sense to get a card that will support it.
Yeah my bad
Well, there are a lot of good 1440P screen for around the £250 - £300 mark, not one of them Free-Sync, well, one, with a useless range.
it seems to me they are trying to use it as a feature to drive sales of very expensive screens, which is really cynical and completely flawed, people who spend that kind of money on screens are more often not looking for Free-Sync than those in the lower price bracket.
That's not gonna be here for at least another year or two, and I'm not even talking about affordable here, just here. Meanwhile new GPUs will be out and you will be able to cycle through other cards at that time if you really want it - all the while enjoying extra performance now. But making a decision based on things not being able to affect you yet? It's not that great of a decision. It's like opportunity cost, except in this case it's opportunity enjoyment.