- Joined
- 15 Oct 2014
- Posts
- 746
- Location
- Somerset England
Any reason it's a straight no with Ryzen at all?
As far as I can see, it offers little to nothing in the way of gaming improvment over my trusty 4770K. Also it just doesnt feel like the right long-term investment for me looking to the future...
The 6 cores clocked on x299 would be next. That's unless you want to gamble with zen+ and buy into the platform now. The 1600x out soon will make x299 look very expensive I think.
Not so worried about the price of the platform, more the longevity! Does anyone know if Battlefield 1 would use more than 4 cores on a Skylake-E system? or is it outright speed as find in the high-end mainstream parts it favours?