Associate
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2005
- Posts
- 1,595
I wonder how much taxpayer's money those diagrams cost to produce.
NHS Body Map Genitals Or No Genitals?
- Thread starter Captain-Fungi
- Start date
What exactly is wrong with it in your opinion?
Loads wrong with it.
But we should still have the NHS, just needs back dating to when it actually worked.
Less managers, less read tape. Matrons who actually made sure things where clean and they where also revered. The NHS should be state of the art and excellent. However it's neither. due to so much wasted money and mis management.
I thought we were talking about NHS Choices (i.e. the website) rather than the NHS itself?
Good point. |I just thought he meant NHS in general. But your correct. And I agree with him. Choices like this are a waste of money. how can you have a medical diagram with out the human anatomy on them.
My main problem with NHSChoices is that it is throwing a whole heap of (much needed) NHS funding at a largely superficial website, giving the illusion of increased choice whilst simultaneously limiting patient choice. Not to mention the fact that the site itself, much like NHSredirect, seems to be largely content free, providing information which is either misleading, unneccessary (ie stuff a reasonably well-trained chimp would know), or just plain wrong (and therefore in this context downright dangerous).
It's just another case of the nuLabour, think-tank, yoof-friendly PR machine pandering to the worried well of the middle classes who do not need the information it provides. The money could be far better spent on innumerable other areas (improving health/healthcare of the working classes, decreasing the value of a QALY for NICE - thus providing more and better drugs, improving access generally to healthcare, etc etc etc)
It's just another case of the nuLabour, think-tank, yoof-friendly PR machine pandering to the worried well of the middle classes who do not need the information it provides. The money could be far better spent on innumerable other areas (improving health/healthcare of the working classes, decreasing the value of a QALY for NICE - thus providing more and better drugs, improving access generally to healthcare, etc etc etc)
Associate
Looks like common sense won through - http://www.nhs.uk/Pages/Bodymapvote.aspx. Hurrah.
Associate
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2007
- Posts
- 621
LOL
This country gets better and better.
This country gets better and better.
Soldato
Why do you think?
To stop men feeling **** about themselves, the same reason adverts with male beauty products have incredibly feminine men.
Besides, flaccid size isn't a true measure of "size", stretched size is.
Caporegime
They were far more prudish in Victorian times. In fact, in the early twentieth century one group even campaigned that all animals should have their genitals covered.
NHS madness though, but you have to laugh.
NHS madness though, but you have to laugh.
Caporegime
Jesus christ this country's getting ******* worse, its the human body ffs, of course it should have a bloody **** and balls on it.
Is it just me or does the women's genitalia look the same in both diagrams? :/
I don't see the problem, it's a medical diagram - anyone can look up vagina or penis simply by going to wikipedia or google, and I'm pretty sure children are more likely to be on those than looking at a 3D model of the Human Body via the NHS.
Geez.
I don't see the problem, it's a medical diagram - anyone can look up vagina or penis simply by going to wikipedia or google, and I'm pretty sure children are more likely to be on those than looking at a 3D model of the Human Body via the NHS.
Geez.