Nibiru..2012 the end?
- Thread starter thevet
- Start date
I thought it better than starting another Nibiru thread.
is it just possible that the world government have know about this since 1983 when the 1st infra-red telescope went up, Was the 2008 bank failures a way of siphoning money away to pay for research/preventive measures? Quantitative easing? Is Copenhagen conference about nibiru? I mean there is a possibility that all of that is true however slim you cannot deny that as I am sure that if this was the case the last people to know would be the general public.
link
I highly doubt you can see something that is 3X further out than pluto with the human eye. As the light given off is only seen in the infra-red spectrum.
) Came accross this which i found funny...It also happens to be absolutely bloody huge. And even a brown dwarf would give off visible light.
Some astronomers say the heat-emitting object is an unseen collapsed star or possibly a "brown dwarf" — a protostar that never got hot enough to become a star. However, a growing number of astronomers insist that the object is a dark, gaseous mass that is slowly evolving into a planet.
Come on now labrat, how many people would be looking for this in the world today?
If it is real and was out there we wouldn't be seeing the same images over and over again.
Also the ra and dec you give, all i see is mars
Last edited:
Funny how if you google for the location of planet x you get that many ref's you get lost in space.
no its right on the blue line ecliptic orbit only visible in IRIS to left and down from mars
video is bit
Except about 4 minutes in, he says this object is within Neptune's orbit. This contradicts your earlier post which said it's 3 times more distant than Pluto.
Oh good grief.
Do you realise that you're arguing that every previous observation is wrong, that the maths involved is fundamentally wrong, that the entire field of astronomy is fundamentally wrong and that the theory of mavity is fundamentally wrong?
If there was a brown dwarf incoming for 2012, you wouldn't even need a telescope to see it by now. You'd be able to see it with the naked eye. In daylight. In a city. With all the lights on. It wouldn't be much dimmer than a full moon.
Also, everyone observing the motion of the outer planets (and there are many different people doing so) would have noticed the perturbation of their orbits caused by the gravitational field of a brown dwarf.
Ridiculous.
I can deny it because if there was an incoming brown dwarf on a 3500 year orbit due to pass through Earth's orbit in 2012 I would be able to see it myself by now, without a telescope.
Jeez, this isn't advanced science. How the hell could this world government (which doesn't even exist) hide a brown dwarf in space?
If this conspiracy existed and if it was capable of hiding the light and mavity of a brown dwarf, there still wouldn't be a problem because then they'd had the technology to push it out the way.
This would be a joke as a plot for a B-grade sci-fi film, let alone as reality.
A brown dwarf close enough to be on a 3500 year orbit and to cross Earth's orbit in 2012 would by now be the third brightest object in the sky, after the sun and a full moon. Brown dwarfs don't only emit infrared. They also emit in the visible light spectrum. Much less, certainly, but some. Far more than enough to make one visible to the naked eye if it was close enough to be getting here by 2012 on a 3500 year orbit.
Even if you ingore that, the inconvenient fact of mavity remains. If there was a brown dwarf within 4000 AU, it could be detected easily by mavity alone. 4000 AU is more than 100 times further out than Pluto.
Put simply - it isn't there. No end of people have been looking for it for decades. It's not there. It doesn't exist. It could not be concealed if it did exist.
By the way, that 1983 finding you mentioned was looking at far more distant objects. Some luminous gas clouds in our own galaxy, some other galaxies. That's one problem with single observations from a single point in space - you can't immediately tell if you're looking at a weaker, closer source or a stronger, more distant source. The astronomers, of course, said that explicitly and, of course, were ignored by conspiracy believers desperate for some some data they could pretend propped up their faith.
Unsurprisingly, the astonomers kept looking. They published their results:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/n...J...290L...5H&db_key=AST&high=3ccf23290006822
As would the observation errors that astronomers noted decades ago.
Those deviations in the orbits of Neptune and Uranus? They're not real. They were observational errors introduced by less sensitive equipment. Astronomers noticed that a very long time ago.
Besides, there's a big difference between a Mars-sized planet 100AU out (which might possibly exist) and a brown dwarf that's going to hit the Earth in 2012 (which can't possbly exist unless it's being teleported in a couple of years from now).
Last edited:
This whole Nibiru, Planet X thing has got to be one of the most pathetic and utterly insane conspiracy theories I have heard, and I'm just so astonished that its as popular as it is!! Even the one about the royal family secretly being lizards is more believable than this!
The standards of today's conspiracy theorists have declined dramatically! Can't they think of anything better? Or maybe its perhaps todays society is so bad that the need for escapism has increased?
The standards of today's conspiracy theorists have declined dramatically! Can't they think of anything better? Or maybe its perhaps todays society is so bad that the need for escapism has increased?