Nice Modding.......

Status
Not open for further replies.
I got suspended once for linking to a less than official online dictionary. I subsequently saw other do the same and not suffer the same fate.

My life continued, the sun still rose the next day.

Get over it, learn a lesson and get on with your life. It's not that important.
 
So you think swearing should be allowed?

I think he is saying that for a first offence (one that wasn't done intentionally), it was a bit serve. A slap on the wrist and a reminder would have been better in this case.
 
In before close :p

duck-chase-gif.gif
 
I don't understand this fully starring out swear words business.

If it's a swear that can get you banned or an infraction, it's auto-starred. If it doesn't get starred out then clearly it's not an issue (although I have once received an infraction for using a word not that is not auto-starred).

It seems to me that 'not fully starring out swear words' is akin to 'working around the auto-censor', which is much more of an intent-based offence than an outcome-based offence. As far as I am aware there are no auto-censored words where only vowels of the offending word are starred out which would leave the balance of responsibility on the poster, the whole word goes. Even the case of a word literally meaning male cow faeces, the 'bull' part of the word is starred out.
 
I came here expecting to see pictures of someone cramming a watercooled dual cpu PC into a thermos flask.
 
So you think swearing should be allowed?

It is not the issue of "no swearing allowed" that i disagree with, infact my attempt to star out the word should imply that i fully agree with the fact that swearing shouldnt be an open free for all. What miffed me was the way it was handled, and the fact i didnt get a response from a "contact us" mail i sent highlighting my thoughts about this.

To me a response to that would have been sufficent and i wouldnt have felt the desire to make a silly forum thread to "vent" a little.

To really be pedantic about things i funnily enough spent a little time reviewing the rules during my ban:

the rule i breached (because i was a tool and hadnt previously read the forum rules and worked on common sense alone):

No swearing, posting of "adult" material, personal attacks or "trolling"
OcUK would like you and your whole family to learn and share via our forums. For this reason swearing and the posting of "adult" or offensive material is forbidden. Simply replacing some of the letters in a swearword with a * or any other character is not acceptable. If you must then please replace the whole word with ***** or other repeated character. We also expect members to behave respectfully and not launch personal or abusive attacks on other members. Those who post for the sole purpose of causing trouble are not welcome here and will be dealt with accordingly.


What happens if I break the rules? (like i did for the first time on monday)

At best your post will be edited by the appropriate Don and you will be issued a warning. If the offence is more serious, your post will be deleted and you may be suspended for a period of time decided by the moderators. Posting "why was my post edited/deleted?" etc. will only make matters worse so please don't. For persistant and deliberate rule-breakers your account will be "Nuked". That means you are no longer welcome on these forums and your account will no longer function. If you re-register, your new account will be nuked immediately. Multiple accounts are not allowed under any circumstances.

so a minor breach of rules (posting up a joke with 1 swear word in, possibly considered adult, but no more adult then some of the lovely lady pics seen in the random images thread) is considered "more serious offence", even though my post was merely edited not deleted, and toping that off given that suspension even after post deletion is still a "maybe" I was miffed enough to want to make this post.
 
So i got suspended for not fully starring out a swear word - what a tool.

What concerns me is this, if i hadnt attempted to star out the word at all it would have happened automatically and no ban.

For a first offence as well this seems quite extreme to me, what on earth is wrong with a slap on the wrist and a dont do this again note? Especially when variations on said 4 letter swear word can be seen all over the boards with no attempts at starring out and just a couple of changed letters.

Seems to me that someone got a little power hungry on monday!

Expect a response "we cannot see everything all the time, so you were unlucky to get caught" or something similar :p

Same thing happened to me ages ago.

I suggest you move on with your life as there are far more important things to get wound up over than being suspended for an internet forum for a day or two.
 
To be fair, he has a point. There's nothing wrong with a warning for a first offence. Suspension is a bit overkill.

Given the post count though, you should know better by now OP, so perhaps that's why you got hit bith a temp ban
 
So no swearing is good but partial swearing is okay. How partial - one letter starred, two? how about three or only when it's obvious what it means to (to who?) or any other variation you can think of? It quickly becomes impossible to judge anything and as a result nothing is judged.

Regarding punishment nobody takes notice of a slap on the wrist and as you rightly point out mostly people get away with it - so what would be the point in having a rule if people mostly got away with it and only got a slap on the wrist on the one occasion it was spotted?

I'm all for being reasonable and pragmatic but you're not seeing that idea from the other side of the fence. It simply isn't possible for a few volunteer mods to do what you ask.
 
If you'd bothered to read the FAQ then you wouldn't be in this predicament ;)

O and calling a mod a tool? Nice going, I think a 7 day holiday would be suitable...
 
Regarding punishment nobody takes notice of a slap on the wrist and as you rightly point out mostly people get away with it - so what would be the point in having a rule if people mostly got away with it and only got a slap on the wrist on the one occasion it was spotted?

I wouldn't have a problem saying "fair enough, won't happen again" if it had been pointed out to a mod... I don't think it's fair to assume that everyone will keep trying it on unless they are banned/suspended for it outright.
 
I wouldn't have a problem saying "fair enough, won't happen again" if it had been pointed out to a mod... I don't think it's fair to assume that everyone will keep trying it on unless they are banned/suspended for it outright.

Agreed, in most cases it's a lack of awareness, and simply warning them and a stern "read the bloody FAQ" would resolve it. Repeat offenses are obviously different. I do think that the OP's post count is grounds for assuming he should know better though, so I do see potential grounds for the suspension.

While I understand mods want to minimise the number of pointless tasks they face like making noobs read the FAQ, that shouldn't be a reason to risk alienating the community they're trying to support.
 
Last edited:
I got an infraction for using a series of completely acceptable words in an absolutely disgusting way. That's good moderating. Don't really get why people have to bleat.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom