Permabanned
The way language is used by 99.99999% of people is what the language means.
Not what 0.000001% say it means.
Not what 0.000001% say it means.
Take the first two letters from both words and squint a bit, it's obvbiously racist.
Does that sum it up or have I missed something?
You joke, but I work in the electronics industry, Master + Slave has been used for ages to describe the roles of end points of a connection. There is talk to ban this and replace it with other words.Maybe we should look down on the word 'slave' too. Clearly connected to slavery.
It's been front page news in several news outlets.Am I understanding this correct.
Laura said the word bitty gritty. Someone was so outraged they complained about the use of the word. Just 1 person.
It was found that the use was fine and nothing happened.
Then stockhausen, so outraged about the outrage, made a thread to talk about this one single person complaint?
Does that sum it up or have I missed something?
If correct, stock you honestly need to get a life along with the person that made the complaint.
Now personally I cannot stand Ms Kuenssberg but what paranoid lunatic came up with this bizarre etymological theory
Funnily enough they managed to get the "A-OK" diving hand signal banned, as it's now associated with white supremacy, lawls.If all the words that any desperately offended person allergic to thinking decrees are somehow offensive are banned, the desperately offended people will have to think of new excuses for blaming other people and thinking isn't what they do. So we should use all the words that offend them as much as possible, for their sake.
In related news, the letter 'n' should be banned immediately because it's so closely associated with racism - "the n word". So obviously 'n' is a megaracist letter and I should be hanged for typing it.
The fact that nobody knows the etymology of "nitty gritty" for certain is irrelevant. The fact that the phrase has no connection to slavery or racism is irrelevant. Facts are irrelevant. Reality is irrelevant. All that matters is that someone decrees that a word or phrase is offensive to a higher status group identity. Even if they're outright lying. One example that comes to mind is 'handicapped'. Some people decreed that it was offensive to a higher status group identity and created a fake etymology to "prove" their point. The real etymology(*) is well documented. It's also irrelevant because a big part of the point is that ideology is more important than reality. Things mean what the Ministry of Truth says they mean and that is all.
* It originates from a custom linked to setting odds for gambling on horse races.
Divers must be screwed now then.Funnily enough they managed to get the "A-OK" diving hand signal banned, as it's now associated with white supremacy, lawls.
Funnily enough they managed to get the "A-OK" diving hand signal banned, as it's now associated with white supremacy, lawls.
Yeah it started off as a p-take by 4chan iirc, saying that the hand signal was associated with white supremacist movements (for the lulz), then some of those groups genuinely adopted it and now it's a bona fide white supremacist hand signal. And thus banned, lol.Is that serious? I thought it was weird seeing all those lunatics in the US doing the a-OK sign.
If that’s really the way we’re going, we need a massive social shift - This is ridiculous isn’t it?!
It might be funny if this canard were actually true. However, who exactly is going to take any action over this signal in the deep?Funnily enough they managed to get the "A-OK" diving hand signal banned, as it's now associated with white supremacy . . .
One of America’s oldest civil rights organisations has said it does not think the thumb and forefinger “OK” hand gesture is a white supremacist sign.
The Anti-Defamtion League (ADL) issued the clarification after two journalists known to be supporters of Donald Trump made the sign while standing behind the podium at the White House press briefing room.