NUCLEARUS BENCHMARK :)

Status
Not open for further replies.
roy23 said:
w00t top single core score! :D ;)

(for now I bet...)

This is a mobile barton 2500+ running at 1.4v
Unlocked multipliers - those were the days :)
I've had it boot at ~2.4G but not so stable, might try to push it before it goes.

Ahh unlocked multi's...those were the days eh? lol

You'll be surprised how high NUCLEARUS will complete. On my rigs it's usually the last bench to fail.
 
Greenboi said:
Maybe after so many results if theres a load of results from different people with the same CPUs, there could be a table with the highest results for that cpu with the persons name, cpu, and score? If that makes sense.... just an idea!
Sounds fair enough....I'll start making a new section now :)

RaiderX said:
Does anyone know why Mandelbrots Fractal is so low, ive seen some people with over 5000 with slower core speeds

and CPU is at 3.30 not 3.40

Hmmm that's a strange one....have you tried a few runs to see if it alters?
 
roy23 said:
this is the point at which I started to cack myself :-) :p

round of applause....that's a fine increase there roy.....smokin' :) not literally I hope :D

I remember a guy pushin' a similar M 2500+ to 3.6ghz on phase a couple of years back.....you should look into WC bud. Even if you do upgrade, a core like that.....it's a shame to let it sleep :(
 
coneypark said:
Hi again, Here is my updated attempt with CPu at 3.6:-
good 1
Amonlym said:
i was jut working on my old 2500 mobile... got 39xx at 2560ish (12.5*205) then it reset :'(

ill try again tomorrow. first xp past 4000 maybe???

Klassic....fingers crossed. This has got me considering pulling out a few old rigs.....we could have an old-school battle... :D

Watch this space :)
 
Greenboi said:
Thanks man, and thanks for taking the time to do this

No worries mate :)
lay-z-boy said:
icon14.gif
:D
xtr3eme said:
Im still not top dual core... :D

oops, all sorted now ;)
 
w3bbo said:
congrats m8

Amonlym said:
on the main list, the cpu below mine should be above... i know amd = win and all, but fairs fair :)
lol, sssshhht ;)
MisterT said:
spoze it does :) damn that means im back down to 3rd b4 its even updated me to 2nd , lol damn you :)
unlucky bud..next time you move up I won't update for a fortnight ;)

_______
thanx for all submissions
UPDATED
 
Last edited:
MisterT said:
+ my vista performance thing went up 0.1 on cpu :D 5.8(new cpu score),5.9,5.9,5.9
Klassic....:)

Greenboi said:
Yay, thats as far as i could get my 6300 to go... so i think ill leave it there :)

I reckon you can safely say you're getting a nice little bit of free performance there from stock mate......congrats :) Nice one.

UPDATED
 
Last edited:
Greenboi said:
Yeah! Thanks man, im made up with the performance i got out of this thing considering how cheap it was when i got it (£117), made it that far with an Arctic Freezer 7 pro, too :D

Thanks again for updating mine :)

Yeah, I love the price drops you get these days. I'm just holding out 'till I can get a 2GB kit of DDR1200 for 7quid..then I'm 'avin them lol

No worries dude. That's what overclocking is for....FREE POWER :D

edit : Forgot to add
Muhahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahaaaaaa
 
Last edited:
Some more single-core action.....my girls PC this time.

A64 3500+ Winny : DFi ULTRA-D : 2GB DDR400 (Mildly OC'd, I'll crank it later :D )
I dug out an A-XP 2600+ ,an A-XP T-Bird (800mhz or 1ghz not sure) and a 1Ghz Pentium......so I'll bench them later tonight.

4110.jpg
 
Last edited:
steve258 said:
@ SOLDNER-MOFO64: why are you not running your HTT at near-1Ghz?

And well done for keeping the list uptodate! :)

It's just the HTx is still dropped from when I had that rig mate. I left it on 3x so as to avoid having to drop it when I up the CPU FSB.

I've benched with the HTT bus at 550mhz to 1250mhz and saw no difference.
--------
updating
 
Amonlym said:
my laptop, with a old 3400+ clawhammer core, running 2200mhz with sc, 333mhz ram scores

3705

the same cpu at 800mhz = 1340

id like to vote, most energy efficient benchmark on ocuk forums given this time of carbon concern.

89w 2200 clawhammer running .8v @ 800 mhz = 8.5w

thats 158 marks/watt
vs
about 42 marks/watt at full power

desktop is getting about 50 marks/watt

xD

What?

lol, soz...had to say it. Get a screeny off it and I'll add it in the list :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom